A Comparative Study of the Involvement of 17 Arabidopsis Myosin Family Members on the Motility of Golgi and Other Organelles

Gene families with multiple members are predicted to have individuals with overlapping functions. We examined all of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) myosin family members for their involvement in Golgi and other organelle motility. Truncated fragments of all 17 annotated Arabidopsis myosins containing either the IQ tail or tail domains only were fused to fluorescent markers and coexpressed with a Golgi marker in two different plants. We tracked and calculated Golgi body displacement rate in the presence of all myosin truncations and found that tail fragments of myosins MYA1, MYA2, XI-C, XI-E, XI-I, and XI-K were the best inhibitors of Golgi body movement in the two plants. Tail fragments of myosins XI-B, XI-F, XI-H, and ATM1 had an inhibitory effect on Golgi bodies only in Nicotiana tabacum, while tail fragments of myosins XI-G and ATM2 had a slight effect on Golgi body motility only in Nicotiana benthamiana. The best myosin inhibitors of Golgi body motility were able to arrest mitochondrial movement too. No exclusive colocalization was found between these myosins and Golgi bodies in our system, although the excess of cytosolic signal observed could mask myosin molecules bound to the surface of the organelle. From the preserved actin filaments found in the presence of enhanced green fluorescent protein fusions of truncated myosins and the motility of myosin punctae, we conclude that global arrest of actomyosin-derived cytoplasmic streaming had not occurred. Taken together, our data suggest that the above myosins are involved, directly or indirectly, in the movement of Golgi and mitochondria in plant cells.The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) myosin gene family contains 17 members: myosin group XI, which includes 13 members (myosins XI-A, -B, -C, -D, -E, -F, -G, -H, -I, -J, and -K, MYA1, and MYA2), and myosin group VIII, which includes four members (ATM1, ATM2, myosin VIIIA, and myosin VIIIB). Both groups are related to unconventional myosin V (Berg et al., 2001; Foth et al., 2006). The Arabidopsis myosins contain a conserved motor domain with ATPase and actin-binding activities, a number of IQ domains that bind myosin light chains, a coiled-coil domain for dimerization, and a specific tail that binds different cargo (Kinkema and Schiefelbein, 1994; Tominaga et al., 2003). Using these functional domains, myosins convert chemical energy from ATP hydrolysis into physical movement along actin fibers, carrying with their tails membrane-bound organelles or RNA/protein complexes (Li and Nebenführ, 2008b).Plant myosins have been implicated in various cellular activities, such as cytoplasmic streaming (Shimmen and Yokota, 2004; Esseling-Ozdoba et al., 2008), plasmodesmata function (Baluska et al., 2001; Volkmann et al., 2003), organelle movement (Nebenführ et al., 1999; Jedd and Chua, 2002), cytokinesis (Molchan et al., 2002; Collings et al., 2003; Volkmann et al., 2003), endocytosis (Volkmann et al., 2003; Baluska et al., 2004; Samaj et al., 2005), and targeted RNA transport (Hamada et al., 2003). Actomyosin mediated cytoplasmic streaming found in various algae cells reach velocities of up to 100 μm s⁻¹, which is the fastest known myosin-mediated movement (Shimmen and Yokota, 1994).The information that exists regarding specific roles of each plant myosin is rather limited. Immunolocalization studies indicated that myosin XIs are associated with various particles in lily (Lilium longiflorum) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) pollen tubes (Yokota et al., 1995), with mitochondria, plastids, and low-density membranes in maize (Zea mays) root cells (Liu et al., 2001; Wang and Pesacreta, 2004), and with endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in tobacco BY2 cells (Yokota et al., 2008). Specific antibodies against MYA2 showed that it is associated with peroxisomes in epidermal and guard cells of Arabidopsis leaves (Hashimoto et al., 2005). More recent studies using recombinant DNA fusions to fluorescent proteins showed localization of the tails of MYA2, MYA1, XI-K, and XI-I to peroxisomes (Li and Nebenführ, 2007; Reisen and Hanson, 2007) and MYA1 partially localized to Golgi (Li and Nebenführ, 2007). Furthermore, it was shown that peroxisomes, Golgi, and mitochondrial motility were arrested by dominant negative mutants of myosin XI-K and myosin XI-E (Avisar et al., 2008b; Sparkes et al., 2008). Arrest of organelle motility was also found in Arabidopsis knockout plants xi-k and mya2 (Peremyslov et al., 2008) and double mutants xi-k/mya1, xi-k/mya2, and mya2/xi-b (Prokhnevsky et al., 2008). In contrast, the association of the single globular tail domain of MYA1 or MYA2 with peroxisomes did not arrest their motility (Li and Nebenführ, 2007). Knockout plants for myosin xi-k and mya2 had root hair phenotypes (Ojangu et al., 2007; Peremyslov et al., 2008); however, all other 11 myosin XI single knockouts looked normal under regular growth conditions (Peremyslov et al., 2008). Reciprocal stimulation between dimerization via the coiled-coil domains of MYA1 and organelle binding was suggested (Li and Nebenführ, 2008a). As for myosin VIII, immunostaining studies showed that it localized to the cell periphery at plant-specific structures such as plasmodesmata and cytokinetic cell plates (Reichelt et al., 1999; Baluska et al., 2001). Recent data from our laboratory and from others confirmed the presence of myosin VIII in plasmodesmata (Golomb et al., 2008) and the cell plate (Van Damme et al., 2004) and further provided evidence for its involvement with endocytosis (Golomb et al., 2008; Sattarzadeh et al., 2008) and its colocalization with the ER (Golomb et al., 2008). In addition, it was shown that myosin VIII is involved in the plasmodesmata targeting of the beet yellows virus protein Hsp70h (Avisar et al., 2008a).We have determined the role of all 17 genes through transient overexpression of dominant negative forms in leaf epidermal cells. Fluorescent dominant negative fusions not only provide data on the subcellular location but also provide a relatively easy way of determining expression. Additionally, overexpression of dominant negative forms can expose a role of an individual member, which might be masked by redundant activity, if it was silenced. In order to undertake such a large-scale study, we needed to choose an efficient, fast, and reproducible expression system. Therefore, Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient expression in Nicotiana leaves was suitable.