Genetic isolation between coastal and fishery‐impacted,offshore bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations |
| |
| Authors: | Simon J Allen Kate A Bryant Robert H S Kraus Neil R Loneragan Anna M Kopps Alexander M Brown Livia Gerber Michael Krützen |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Cetacean Research Unit, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia;2. Centre for Marine Futures, School of Animal Biology and Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia;3. School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia;4. Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany;5. Department of Migration and Immuno‐Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Radolfzell, Germany;6. Evolutionary Genetics Group, Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;7. Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia |
| |
| Abstract: | The identification of species and population boundaries is important in both evolutionary and conservation biology. In recent years, new population genetic and computational methods for estimating population parameters and testing hypotheses in a quantitative manner have emerged. Using a Bayesian framework and a quantitative model‐testing approach, we evaluated the species status and genetic connectedness of bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations off remote northwestern Australia, with a focus on pelagic ‘offshore’ dolphins subject to incidental capture in a trawl fishery. We analysed 71 dolphin samples from three sites beyond the 50 m depth contour (the inshore boundary of the fishery) and up to 170 km offshore, including incidentally caught and free‐ranging individuals associating with trawl vessels, and 273 dolphins sampled at 12 coastal sites inshore of the 50 m depth contour and within 10 km of the coast. Results from 19 nuclear microsatellite markers showed significant population structure between dolphins from within the fishery and coastal sites, but also among dolphins from coastal sites, identifying three coastal populations. Moreover, we found no current or historic gene flow into the offshore population in the region of the fishery, indicating a complete lack of recruitment from coastal sites. Mitochondrial DNA corroborated our findings of genetic isolation between dolphins from the offshore population and coastal sites. Most offshore individuals formed a monophyletic clade with common bottlenose dolphins (T. truncatus), while all 273 individuals sampled coastally formed a well‐supported clade of Indo‐Pacific bottlenose dolphins (T. aduncus). By including a quantitative modelling approach, our study explicitly took evolutionary processes into account for informing the conservation and management of protected species. As such, it may serve as a template for other, similarly inaccessible study populations. |
| |
| Keywords: | bycatch delphinids gene flow migration population structure |
|
|
