首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


A randomized phase II trial of personalized peptide vaccine plus low dose estramustine phosphate (EMP) versus standard dose EMP in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer
Authors:Masanori Noguchi  Tatsuyuki Kakuma  Hirotsugu Uemura  Yasutomo Nasu  Hiromi Kumon  Yasuhiko Hirao  Fukuko Moriya  Shigetaka Suekane  Kei Matsuoka  Nobukazu Komatsu  Shigeki Shichijo  Akira Yamada  Kyogo Itoh
Institution:1. Department of Urology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
2. Clinical Research Division, Research Center for Innovative Cancer Therapy, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume, 830-0011, Japan
3. Department of Bio-statistics, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
4. Department of Urology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Sakai, Japan
5. Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
6. Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
7. Department of Immunology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
Abstract:Personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) combined with chemotherapy could be a novel approach for many cancer patients. In this randomized study, we evaluated the anti-tumor effect and safety of PPV plus low-dose estramustine phosphate (EMP) as compared to standard-dose EMP for HLA-A2- or -A24-positive patients with castration resistant prostate cancer. Patients were randomized into groups receiving either PPV plus low-dose EMP (280 mg/day) or standard-dose EMP (560 mg/day). After disease progression, patients were switched to the opposite regime. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). We randomly assigned 28 patients to receive PPV plus low-dose EMP and 29 patients to receive standard-dose EMP. Nineteen events in the PPV group and 20 events in the EMP group occurred during the first treatment. Median PFS for the first treatment was 8.5 months in the PPV group and 2.8 months in the EMP group with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.28 (95% CI, 0.14–0.61; log-rank P = 0.0012), while there was no difference for median PFS for the second treatment. The HR for overall survival was 0.3 (95% CI, 0.1–0.91) in favor of the PPV plus low-dose EMP group (log-rank, P = 0.0328). The PPV plus low-dose EMP was well tolerated without major adverse effects and with increased levels of IgG and cytotoxic-T cell responses to the vaccinated peptides. PPV plus low-dose EMP was associated with an improvement in PSA-based PFS as compared to the standard-dose EMP alone.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号