Male barn swallows use different resource allocation rules to produce ornamental tail feathers

Sexual ornaments compete for resources with other functionaltraits. Such resource allocation trade-offs should ensure thehonesty of sexual ornaments according to the Zahavi's handicapprinciple. However, the existence of costly signals could notbe enough to guarantee honesty if different individuals investdifferent proportions of their limited resources in ornaments.Then, a certain level of sexual signaling would correspond toseveral levels of individual condition. Here, we explore whetherthere are different resource allocation rules in tail featherornaments between males within a barn swallow (Hirundo rustica)population and whether these different rules confer differentviability to males. We assessed the proportion of resourcesinvested in ornamental feathers compared with other functionalfeathers moulted and growing during the same period at expensesof the same resources. We found that 1) different males allocatea different proportion of resources to ornamental feathers inrelation to functional feathers and this proportion is repeatablebetween years and 2) male survival likelihood decreased as theproportion of resources allocated to ornamental feathers increased.Survival costs associated with increased investments in ornamentscan maintain the sexual signaling system honest at populationlevel but do not preclude the existence of an array of differentallocation rules between males. Thus, males with different viabilitycan produce ornamental feathers of the same length. These resultsshow that the relationship between male viability and ornamentexpression can be less straightforward than considered previously.