Self-Transmissible Mercury Resistance Plasmids with Gene-Mobilizing Capacity in Soil Bacterial Populations: Influence of Wheat Roots and Mercury Addition

A set of mercury resistance plasmids was obtained from wheat rhizosphere soil amended or not amended with mercuric chloride via exogenous plasmid isolation by using Pseudomonas fluorescens R2f, Pseudomonas putida UWC1, and Enterobacter cloacae BE1 as recipient strains. The isolation frequencies were highest from soil amended with high levels of mercury, and the isolation frequencies from unamended soil were low. With P. putida UWC1 as the recipient, the isolation frequency was significantly enhanced in wheat rhizosphere compared to bulk soil. Twenty transconjugants were analyzed per recipient strain. All of the transconjugants contained plasmids which were between 40 and 50 kb long. Eight selected plasmids were distributed among five groups, as shown by restriction digestion coupled with a similarity matrix analysis. However, all of the plasmids formed a tight group, as judged by hybridization with two whole-plasmid probes and comparisons with other plasmids in dot blot hybridization analyses. The results of replicon typing and broad-host-range incompatibility (Inc) group-specific PCR suggested that the plasmid isolates were not related to any previously described Inc group. Although resistance to copper, resistance to streptomycin, and/or resistance to chloramphenicol was found in several plasmids, catabolic sequences were generally not identified. One plasmid, pEC10, transferred into a variety of bacteria belonging to the β and γ subdivisions of the class Proteobacteria and mobilized as well as retromobilized the IncQ plasmid pSUP104. A PCR method for detection of pEC10-like replicons was used, in conjunction with other methods, to monitor pEC10-homologous sequences in mercury-polluted and unpolluted soils. The presence of mercury enhanced the prevalence of pEC10-like replicons in soil and rhizosphere bacterial populations.The potential use of genetically modified bacteria in agriculture has raised questions pertaining to the spread of introduced recombinant DNA through soil bacterial communities. Gene transfer in soil via conjugation has received much attention, and the focus of most studies has been the transfer and fate of introduced plasmids (6, 22, 27–29, 39). Under favorable conditions, in specific soil microhabitats, or under selection conditions, both self-transmissible and mobilizable plasmids present in introduced hosts can be transferred to introduced recipients, as well as to a variety of indigenous bacteria (15, 20, 27, 28, 33). In particular, rhizospheres of crop plants, such as wheat and sugar beet, provide conditions conducive to conjugal plasmid transfer between bacterial inhabitants (15, 36). When genetically modified bacteria are developed as inoculants for the rhizosphere, insertion of heterologous DNA into non-self-transmissible plasmids or the chromosome might restrict conjugal transfer of this DNA to members of the indigenous bacterial community. However, mobilizing or retromobilizing (33) plasmids present in indigenous soil bacteria could potentially still effect the transfer of the less mobile heterologous DNA via chromosome or plasmid mobilization, which may involve cointegration (9, 19, 31). Such plasmids might thus be responsible for the escape of heterologous DNA from genetically modified bacteria introduced into soil.There is a paucity of knowledge concerning the incidence of plasmids with mobilizing capacity in soils and rhizospheres, as well as concerning the effects of soil factors, such as stresses resulting from pollution or from natural causes (e.g., rhizosphere acidity), on plasmid prevalence and transfer (e.g., reference 38). Whereas it has been suggested that chemical stress often does not enhance plasmid incidence in selected soil bacterial populations (40), pollution in river water or mines (in particular mercury pollution) has been found to exert a selective (enhancing) effect (4, 13).Plasmids of environmental bacteria have classically been obtained by endogenous isolation procedures (20). Endogenous isolation implies that putative plasmid hosts with the phenotype of interest are isolated from soil, after which plasmids are extracted from pure cultures of these strains. On the other hand, pioneering studies performed with river stone epilithon (9) and later extended to soil and sediment (32) have shown that plasmids can be obtained directly from indigenous bacterial communities in new hosts by exogenous isolation. In this approach, plasmids are captured in selectable recipient strains by using mating between these strains and the total bacterial community obtained from an environmental sample. Following incubation, the mating mixture is plated with selection for the recipient and an additional marker gene presumedly located on a plasmid present in the indigenous bacteria (6). The advantage of the exogenous isolation procedure is that no culturing step is required in the mating, which thus allows isolation of plasmids from nonculturable hosts. Furthermore, plasmids are directly selected for their transfer capacity, in addition to the presence of a specific selectable marker.In this study, exogenous plasmid isolation was employed to obtain transferable plasmids from soil bacteria by using mercury resistance as the selectable marker. The objective of this work was to gain insight into the potential present in soil bacterial populations to (retro)mobilize genes out of introduced bacteria into members of the soil bacterial community. Since the incidence of plasmids in soil bacteria is likely influenced by soil ecological factors and selection pressure, the presence of wheat roots and selection by mercury (25) were studied as experimental variables.