From icons to symbols: Some speculations on the origins of language

This paper is divided into three sections. In the first section we offer a retooling of some traditional concepts, namely icons and symbols, which allows us to describe an evolutionary continuum of communication systems. The second section consists of an argument from theoretical biology. In it we explore the advantages and disadvantages of phenotypic plasticity. We argue that a range of the conditions that selectively favor phenotypic plasticity also favor a nongenetic transmission system that would allow for the inheritance of acquired characters. The first two sections are independent, the third depends on both of them. In it we offer an argument that human natural languages have just the features required of an ideal transmission mechanism under the conditions described in section 2.We would like to thank Robert Boyd, Noam Chomsky, Gerald Feinberg, Ken Glander, David Hull, Ernst Mayr, John Rawls, Peter Richerson, william Wimsatt and Paul Ziff for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Special thanks go to Doug Stalker who was instrumental in both the origins and development of this work.