Water Flow Across the Sieve-Tube Boundary: Estimating Turgor and Some Implications for Phloem Loading and Unloading. II. Phloem in the Stem

Confirming a previous analysis by Lang (1974), it is concludedthat in tree trunks, phloem turgor and turgor gradients maybe estimated from osmotic pressure and osmotic-pressure gradients,respectively. The present analysis is an improvement becauseit is based on observed osmotic-pressure gradients rather thansupposed turgor gradients, and allowance is made for sucroseunloading and gradients of external water potential. It is concludedthat the rate of sucrose unloading in tree trunks must be lessthan 50 nmol m^–2 S m^–1. In small plants, higherrates of unloading (100 nmol m m^–2 S m^–1) and steeperconcentration gradients will lead to larger errors, but turgorpressures can still be estimated with acceptable accuracy. Oneshould be more cautious when considering turgor gradients insmall plants, although it seems likely that reasonable estimateswill still be obtained. Assuming plasmodesmatal transport throughan unconstricted cytoplasmic annulus, it is concluded that thesieve elements and their associated cells will sustain verysimilar turgor and osmotic pressures. Convection and diffusioncan both contribute significantly to plasmodesmatal sucroseunloading. Similarly, the plasmodesmatal volume flux will reflecta combination of pressure flow and osmosis. Water fluxes acrossthe sieve element plasmalemma and through the plasmodesmatacan be in opposite directions. It may be possible to assessthe extent of hydraulic coupling between the sieve elementsand their associated cells from studies of phloem water relations Phloem, turgor, osmotic pressure, plasmodesmata, phloem unloading, Munch hypothesis