Differential roles of microtubule and actin-myosin cytoskeleton in the growth of Pinus pollen tubes

The behavior and role of the microtubule (MT) and actin-myosin components of the cytoskeleton during pollen tube growth in two species of Pinus were studied using anti--tubulin, rhodamine-phalloidin, anti-myosin, and the appropriate inhibitors. Within germinated pollen tubes MTs were arranged obliquely or transversely, but in elongated tubes they were arranged along the tube's long axis. MTs were localized in the tube tip region, excluding the basal part. Altered growth was found in pollen tubes treated with colchicine; the tips of many pollen tubes incubated in the liquid medium were branched and/or rounded, and those in the agar medium were divided into many branches. Both the branching and the rounding were considered to be caused by the disturbance of polarizing growth of the tube due to MT disorganization with colchicine treatment. Actin filaments (F-actin) were found in the major parts of many pollen tubes along their long axis, excluding the tip region. In a few tubes, however, F-actin was distributed throughout the tube. The areas in the pollen tube containing F-actin were filled with abundant cytoplasmic granules, but the areas without F-actin had very few granules. The tube nucleus, which migrated from the grain area into the tube, was closely associated with F-actin. Germination of pollen grains treated with cytochalasin B was little affected, but further tube elongation was inhibited. Myosin was identified on cytoplasmic granules and to a lesser extent on the tube nucleus in the pollen tubes. Several granules were attached to the nuclear envelope. Tube growth was completely inhibited by N-ethylmaleimide treatment. In generative cells that were retained in the pollen grain, both MT and F-actin networks were observed. Myosin was localized on the cytoplasmic granules but not on the cell surface. In conclusion, it was shown that actin-myosin and MTs were present in gymnospermous Pinus pollen tubes and it is suggested that the former contributed to outgrowth of the tubes and the latter contributed to polarized growth. Several differences in the behavior of cytoskeletal elements in generative cells compared to angiosperms were revealed and are discussed.