Functional and Structural Parallels in Crustacean and Drosophila Neuromuscular Systems

Comparison of morphological and physiological phenotypes ofrepresentative crustacean motor neurons, and selected motorneurons of Drosophila larval abdominal muscles, shows severalfeatures in common. Crustacean motor nerve terminals, and thoseof Drosophila, possess numerous small synapses with well-definedactive zones. In crustaceans, neurons that are more tonicallyactive have markedly varicose terminals; synapses and mitochondriaare selectively localized in the varicosities. Phasic motoraxons have filiform terminals, sometimes with small varicosities;mitochondrial content is less than for tonic axons, and synapsesare distributed along the terminals. Tonic axons generate smallexcitatory potentials which facilitate strongly at higher frequencies,and which are resistant to depression. Thephasic neurons generatelarge excitatory potentials which exhibit relatively littlefrequency facilitation, and depress rapidly. In Drosophila,counterparts of crustacean phasic and tonic motor neurons havebeen found, but the differentiation is less pronounced. It isinferredthat cellular factors regulating the number of participatingsynapses and the probability of quantal release are similarin crustaceans and Drosophila, and that advantage can be takenof this in future to develop experiments addressing the regulationof synaptic plasticity.