A study of modified forms of the Lr19 translocation of common wheat

 Following the induction of allosyndetic pairing between the Thinopyrum-derived Lr19 translocation in ‘Indis’ wheat and homoeologous wheat chromatin, eight suspected recombinants for the Lr19 region were recovered. These selections were characterised for marker loci that were previously used to construct a physical map of the Lr19 segment. At the same time near-isogenic lines were developed for some of the selected segments and tested for seedling leaf-rust resistance in order to confirm the presence of Lr19. It appeared that three of the four white-endosperm selections do not possess Lr19 and only one, 88M22-149, is a true Lr19 recombinant. The resistance gene in the three non-Lr19 selections resides on chromosome 6B, appears to derive from ‘Indis’, and was selected unintentionally during backcrossing. The pedigree of ‘Indis’ is suspect and it is believed that the Lr19 translocation in ‘Indis’ is in reality the Th. ponticum-derived (T4) segment rather than being of Th. distichum origin as was believed earlier. The white-endosperm recombinant, 88M22-149, retained the complete Lr19 resistance and was apparently re-located to chromosome arm 7BL in a double-crossover event. 88M22-149 has lost the Sd1 gene and often shows strong self-elimination in translocation heterozygotes. This effect may result from additional gametocidal loci or from an altered chromosome structure following re-location of the segment. 88M22-149 in fact contains a duplicated region involving the Wsp-B1 locus. Three selections had partially white endosperms and expressed Lr19 and other Thinopyrum marker alleles. Polymorphisms for the available markers confirmed that the translocated segment in at least one of them had been shortened through recombination with chromosome arm 7DL. Further markers need to be studied in order to determine whether the translocation in the remaining two partially white recombinants had also undergone recombination with wheat. The eighth selection has yellow endosperm and appears to self-eliminate in certain translocation heterozygotes. No evidence of recombination could be found with the markers used. If the latter selections are in fact recombinants they may prove useful in attempts to unravel the complex segregation distortion mechanism. Received: 8 August 1996 / Accepted: 10 January 1997