Quantification of Leptosphaeria maculans Growth in Cotyledons of Brassica napus Using ELISA |
| |
Authors: | M.-H. Balesdent I. Desthieux C. Gall P. Robin T. Rouxel |
| |
Affiliation: | INRA, Pathologie Végétale, Route de St Cyr, F-78026 Versailles Cedex, France |
| |
Abstract: | The result of the Leptosphaeria maculans/Brassica napus interaction is usually assessed by symptom scoring following a cotyledon-inoculation test. However, an early evaluation of the interaction, and reliable quantitaive data of fungal growth inside plant tissues are needed to supplement the visual assessment of the symptoms. For this purpose, we developed a quantitatve double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) using rabbit polyclonal antisera directed against soluble mycelial proteins. The specificity of the serum was first assessed by immunoblotting following isoelectric focusing of soluble proteins (Western blot) and by DAS-ELISA. Except for Alternaria brassicae, no cross-reactions were observed with my celial extracts of saprophytes or pathogens of B. napus following DAS-ELISA. Although Tox+ and Tox0 isolates of L. maculans were unequivocally discriminated by Western blot, they were quantitatively indistinguishable following ELISA, thus enabling us to analyse a wide range of L. maculans isolates in planta. The detection limit of the assay was less than 10 ng of fungal proteins per ml of plant extract. For a given isolate, time-course studies showed that fungal growth in cotyledons was correlated with symptom scoring. In the case of hypersensitive response, only 34% of the plants were ELISA-positive, and these plants never contained more than 10 ng of fungal protein per cotyledon. In contrast, in the cases, of susceptibility, 100% of the plants were ELISA-positive and fungal protein content was higher than 10 μg per cotyledon. Moreover, significant differences in ability to colonize the tissues were observed among Tox+ isolates. Finally, using the ELISA quantification, intermediate symptoms could be differentiated as lateresistance responses or susceptibility. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|