首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Physiological and anatomical changes during the early ontogeny of the heteroblastic bromeliad, Vriesea sanguinolenta, do not concur with the morphological change from atmospheric to tank form
Authors:G. ZOTZ,A. ENSLIN,W. HARTUNG,&   H. ZIEGLER
Affiliation:Botanisches Institut der Universität Basel, Schönbeinstrasse 6, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland,;Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apdo 2072, Balboa, Panama,;Lehrstuhl für Botanik II der Universität Würzburg, D-97082 Würzburg, Germany,;Lehrstuhl für Botanik I, Universität Würzburg, Julius-von-Sachs-Platz 2, Würzburg, Germany and;Lehrstuhl für Botanik der Technischen Universität München, Am Hochanger 4, D-85354 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany
Abstract:
Two distinct morphological forms characterize the ontogeny of many epiphytic bromeliads. Smaller plants exhibit an atmospheric habit, while larger plants form water‐impounding tanks. The study of the functional significance of heteroblasty in epiphytes is severely hampered by considerable size‐related variation in morphological, anatomical and physiological parameters. To overcome this problem, plants of varying size of both atmospheric and tank form were included in the present study with Vriesea sanguinolenta. The results show that virtually all morphological, anatomical and physiological characteristics vary during ontogeny, but changes were rarely directly related to the step change in gross morphology. Changes were either: (1) gradual from smallest atmospheric to small tank (e.g. leaf divergence angles, reduction in photosystem II efficiency during drought, speed of recovery after drought); (2) there was no change between atmospheric and small tank, but a gradual or step change within the tank form (stomatal density, relationship of leaf N and specific leaf area); or (3) developmental patterns were more complicated with decreases and increases during ontogeny (photosynthetic capacity, carbon isotope ratios, abscisic acid levels during drought). Although the comparisons between ontogenetic phases were always confounded by size differences, a hypothetical small tank plant is expected to suffer higher water loss than a real atmospheric, whereas a hypothetical, large atmospheric plant would show reduced access to resources, such as nutrients, in comparison with the real tank. The present results are consistent with the notion of heteroblasty as an adaptation of early ontogenetic stages to drought, but highlight that size‐related variation greatly modifies any difference directly associated with the step change from atmospheric to tank.
Keywords:abscisic acid    heteroblasty    intraspecific variability    leaf nitrogen    ontogenetic drift    photosynthesis    phyllotaxis    specific leaf area    vascular epiphytes    water relations
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号