A systematic approach to the comparison of protein structures

A systematic method has been developed for comparing the backbone conformations of proteins (Remington & Matthews, 1978). Two proteins are compared by successively optimizing the agreement between all possible segments of a chosen length from one protein, and all possible segments of the same length from the other protein. The method reveals any similarities between the two proteins, and provides an estimate of the statistical significance of any given structure agreement that is obtained.The method has been tested in a number of cases, including comparisons of the dehydrogenases and of the pancreatic and bacterial serine proteases. These examples were chosen to test the ability of the comparison method to detect structural similarities in the presence of large insertions and deletions. The results suggest that the detection of the “nucleotide binding fold” in the dehydrogenases is at the limit of the capability of the comparison technique in its original form, although it may be possible to generalize the method to allow for insertions and deletions in proteins.The results of many protein comparisons, made with different probe lengths, are summarized. For medium and long probe lengths, the average value of the structural agreement does not depend very much on the type of protein being compared. The average value of the structure agreement increases with the square root of the probe length, but for probe lengths above about 40 residues, the standard deviation is independent of probe length. From these observations it is possible to construct a generalized probability diagram to evaluate the significance of any structure agreement that might be obtained in comparing two proteins.