Split sex ratios in the social Hymenoptera: a meta-analysis

The study of sex allocation in social Hymenoptera (ants, bees,and wasps) provides an excellent opportunity for testing kin-selectiontheory and studying conflict resolution. A queen–workerconflict over sex allocation is expected because workers aremore related to sisters than to brothers, whereas queens areequally related to daughters and sons. If workers fully controlsex allocation, split sex ratio theory predicts that colonieswith relatively high or low relatedness asymmetry (the relatednessof workers to females divided by the relatedness of workersto males) should specialize in females or males, respectively.We performed a meta-analysis to assess the magnitude of adaptivesex allocation biasing by workers and degree of support forsplit sex ratio theory in the social Hymenoptera. Overall, variationin relatedness asymmetry (due to mate number or queen replacement)and variation in queen number (which also affects relatednessasymmetry in some conditions) explained 20.9% and 5% of thevariance in sex allocation among colonies, respectively. Theseresults show that workers often bias colony sex allocation intheir favor as predicted by split sex ratio theory, even iftheir control is incomplete and a large part of the variationamong colonies has other causes. The explanatory power of splitsex ratio theory was close to that of local mate competitionand local resource competition in the few species of socialHymenoptera where these factors apply. Hence, three of the mostsuccessful theories explaining quantitative variation in sexallocation are based on kin selection.