首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the antimalarial MMV665831 and structural analogs
Institution:1. Department of Chemistry and Virginia Tech Center for Drug Discovery, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, United States;2. Department of Biochemistry and Virginia Tech Center for Drug Discovery, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, United States;1. Food and Pharmacy College, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhejiang, Zhoushan 316022, PR China;2. Key Laboratory of Natural Resource of the Changbai Mountain and Functiaonal Molecules, Ministry of Education, Yanbian University, Jilin Yanji 133000, China;1. Department of Chemistry, Department of Immunology and Microbial Science, The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Worm Institute of Research and Medicine (WIRM), The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, United States;2. Cessation Therapeutics LLC, 3031 Tisch Way Ste 505, San Jose, CA 95128, United States;1. Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, United States;2. Department of Theoretical Chemistry and Biology, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden;1. Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, 10675 John J. Hopkins Dr., San Diego, CA 92121, USA;2. Department of Autoimmunity, Transplantation and Inflammation, Novartis Institutes of Biomedical Research, 4002 Basel, Switzerland
Abstract:Antimalarial candidates possessing novel mechanisms of action are needed to control drug resistant Plasmodium falciparum. We were drawn to Malaria Box compound 1 (MMV665831) by virtue of its excellent in vitro potency, and twelve analogs were prepared to probe its structure–activity relationship. Modulation of the diethyl amino group was fruitful, producing compound 25, which was twice as potent as 1 against cultured parasites. Efforts were made to modify the phenolic Mannich base functionality of 1, to prevent formation of a reactive quinone methide. Homologated analog 28 had reduced potency relative to 1, but still inhibited growth with EC50 ≤ 200 nM. Thus, the antimalarial activity of 1 does not derive from quinone methide formation. Chemical stability studies on dimethyl analog 2 showed remarkable hydrolytic stability of both the phenolic Mannich base and ethyl ester moieties, and 1 was evaluated for in vivo efficacy in P. berghei-infected mice (40 mg/kg, oral). Unfortunately, no reduction in parasitemia was seen relative to control. These results are discussed in the context of measured plasma and hepatocyte stabilities, with reference to structurally-related, orally-efficacious antimalarials.
Keywords:Malaria  Parasite  PAINs  Phenolic mannich base  Malaria box
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号