T-Cell Tolerance for Variability in an HLA Class I-Presented Influenza A Virus Epitope

To escape immune recognition, viruses acquire amino acid substitutions in class I human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-presented cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes. Such viral escape mutations may (i) prevent peptide processing, (ii) diminish class I HLA binding, or (iii) alter T-cell recognition. Because residues 418 to 426 of the hypervariable influenza A virus nucleoprotein (NP_418-426) epitope are consistently bound by class I HLA and presented to CTL, we assessed the impact that intraepitope sequence variability has upon T-cell recognition. CTL elicited by intranasal influenza virus infection were tested for their cross-recognition of 20 natural NP_418-426 epitope variants. Six of the variant epitopes, of both H1N1 and H3N2 origin, were cross-recognized by CTL while the remaining NP_418-426 epitope variants escaped targeting. A pattern emerged whereby variability at position 5 (P5) within the epitope reduced T-cell recognition, changes at P4 or P6 enabled CTL escape, and a mutation at P8 enhanced T-cell recognition. These data demonstrate that substitutions at P4 and/or P6 facilitate influenza virus escape from T-cell recognition and provide a model for the number, nature, and location of viral mutations that influence T-cell cross-recognition.Cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL) kill virus-infected cells and release antiviral cytokines upon recognition of short viral peptides displayed on the cell surface by the class I HLA molecule (36). Virus-derived peptides are processed in the cytoplasm by proteasome degradation of viral proteins (25), shuttled into the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by the transporter-associated protein, and loaded into the basket-like groove of the class I molecule. Class I HLA molecules await peptide loading in the ER and demonstrate specificity for viral peptides with particular anchor residues representing a good fit for the class I HLA binding groove. Once stable class I HLA-peptide complexes are formed, the class I molecule and its peptide cargo are transported via the Golgi apparatus to the cell surface, where the complex is anchored to the plasma membrane (21, 36-38). CTL then survey class I HLA-presented peptides on the cell surface. Viral peptides must therefore be processed, specifically bound by class I HLA, and presented at the plasma membrane for CTL to distinguish infected cells from uninfected tissue.A high mutation rate is one of many mechanisms utilized by viruses to escape detection by the immune system. Mutations within the genome allow viruses to accumulate and select for amino acid substitutions that (i) inhibit proteasome processing and viral peptide generation (2, 23), (ii) alter anchor residues within viral peptides to diminish class I HLA binding specificity (3, 14, 24, 32), or (iii) reduce immune recognition of the class I HLA-peptide complex by varying amino acids that come in contact with the T-cell receptor (6, 10, 27, 30, 35). While viral mutations might be advantageous for escaping immune detection, such flexibility can cost the virus in terms of replicative fitness. In order to maintain reproductive fitness and structural integrity, viruses must temper their use of genetic flexibility as a means of immune escape.Influenza viruses have the well-documented ability to escape detection by various immune epitopes (3, 10, 27). A priori, investigators often assume that variable regions of the virus represent poor immune targets because such regions will not be consistently processed, presented, or recognized (15, 20). However, we along with others continue to find that a hypervariable stretch of the influenza virus nucleoprotein consisting of residues 418 to 426 (NP_418-426) is presented to CTL by different HLA-B alleles (B*0702 and B*3501) in spite of extensive viral variability within this epitope (8, 10, 27, 34). Moreover, NP_418-426 is a dominant immune epitope (8, 10, 27, 34). The consistent processing and presentation of NP_418-426 by class I HLA can be explained by the finding that different influenza virus isolates cannot mutate the proline located at position 2 (P2) within the epitope because elimination of this proline reduces viral fitness (4, 5). Little to no variability is found at the methionine P9 anchor as well. These facts lead to the unique observation that strain-to-strain variability does not abrogate class I HLA presentation of the influenza virus NP_418-426 epitope and that CTL respond to this consistently presented viral epitope in an immunodominant fashion.In this study we took advantage of the anchor residue conservation that prompts the NP_418-426 epitope to be consistently presented to CTL by investigating the functional impact that influenza virus intraepitope variability has on CTL recognition. The amino acid alignment of human influenza A (H1N1 and H3N2) virus nucleoprotein molecules identifies 20 unique NP_418-426 peptide sequences which demonstrate amino acid diversity between the anchors. We infected HLA-transgenic mice intranasally with influenza virus and tested CTL from these animals for their ability to recognize each of the 20 NP_418-426 variants. These 20 NP_418-426 sequences represent a natural “recombinant library” of viral epitopes that the immune system has and will face. The resulting data demonstrate a gradient of viral substitutions whereby CTL recognition diminishes depending upon the number of viral substitutions and their location within the epitope. Understanding how intraepitope variability impacts CTL recognition is discussed in terms of eliciting immune responses to variants of influenza.