Degradation kinetics of biochar from pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization in temperate soils |
| |
Authors: | Mo Bai Burkhard Wilske Franz Buegger Jürgen Esperschütz Claudia Irene Kammann Christian Eckhardt Martin Koestler Philipp Kraft Martin Bach Hans-Georg Frede Lutz Breuer |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Institute for Landscape Ecology and Resources Management (ILR), Research Centre for BioSystems, Land Use and Nutrition (IFZ), Justus Liebig University, Gie?en, Germany 2. Institute of Soil Ecology, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany 3. Department of Plant Ecology, Research Centre for BioSystems, Land Use and Nutrition (IFZ), Justus Liebig University, Gie?en, Germany
|
| |
Abstract: |
Background and Aims Estimates of biochar residence times in soils range over three orders of magnitude. We present the first direct comparison between the biodegradation of a char from hydrothermal carbonization (htcBC) and pyrolysis (pyrBC) with high temporal resolution. Methods Mineralization of the biochars and their shared Miscanthus feedstock in three soils was determined directly by the 13CO2 efflux using a novel method incorporating wavelength scanned cavity ring-down spectroscopy. Biochar half-life (t1/2) was estimated with three empirical models. Results (1) The htcBC was readily biodegradable, whereas pyrBC was more recalcitrant. (2) Cumulative degradation of both biochars increased with soil organic carbon and nitrogen content. (3) The corrected Akaike information criterion (AICC) showed an overall preference for the double exponential model (DEM) reflecting a labile and a recalcitrant C-pool, over the first-order degradation model (FODM) and a logarithmic model. (4) The DEM resulted in t1/2 ranging from 19.7–44.5, 0.7–2.1 and 0.8–1.3 years for pyrBC, htcBC and feedstock, respectively. Conclusion The degradation was rather similar between feedstock and htcBC but one order of magnitude slower for pyrBC. The AICC preferred FODM in two cases, where the DEM parameters indicated no distinction between a labile and recalcitrant carbon pool. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|