首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Evaluating the effect of predators on white-tailed deer: Movement and diet of coyotes
Authors:Melissa M Turner  Aimee P Rockhill  Christopher S DePerno  Jonathan A Jenks  Robert W Klaver  Angela R Jarding  Troy W Grovenburg  Kenneth H Pollock
Institution:1. Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA;2. Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA;3. USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, Sioux Falls, SD 57198, USA;4. Department of Zoology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
Abstract:Coyotes (Canis latrans) may affect adult and neonate white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) survival and have been implicated as a contributor to the decline of deer populations. Additionally, coyote diet composition is influenced by prey availability, season, and region. Because coyote movement and diet vary by region, local data are important to understand coyote population dynamics and their impact on prey species. In southeast Minnesota, we investigated the effect of coyotes on white-tailed deer populations by documenting movement rates, distances moved, and habitats searched by coyotes during fawning and nonfawning periods. Additionally, we determined survival, cause-specific mortality, and seasonal diet composition of coyotes. From 2001 to 2003, we captured and radiocollared 30 coyotes. Per-hour rate of movement averaged 0.87 km and was greater (P = 0.046) during the fawning (1.07 km) than the nonfawning period (0.80 km); areas searched were similar (P = 0.175) between seasons. Coyote habitat use differed during both seasons; habitats were not used in proportion to their availability (P < 0.001). Croplands were used more (P < 0.001) than their proportional availability during both seasons. Use of grasslands was greater during the fawning period (P = 0.030), whereas use of cropland was greater in the nonfawning period (P < 0.001). We collected 66 fecal samples during the nonfawning period; coyote diets were primarily composed of Microtus spp. (65.2%), and consumption of deer was 9.1%. During the study, 19 coyotes died; annual survival rate range was 0.33–0.41, which was low compared with other studies. Consumption of deer was low and coyotes searched open areas (i.e., cropland) more than fawning areas with dense cover. These factors in addition to high coyote mortality suggested that coyote predation was not likely limiting white-tailed deer populations in southeast Minnesota. © 2011 The Wildlife Society.
Keywords:Canis latrans  coyotes  habitat selection  Minnesota  Odocoileus virginianus  white-tailed deer
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号