Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters, nutrient digestibility and growth in sheep: A meta-analysis

Despite the increased use of dry active Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast supplementation in ruminant feeding, inconsistent results among studies hamper the prediction of its effects on animal performance. A meta-analysis has been conducted to quantify the magnitude of yeast supplementation effects on ruminal parameters, total tract nutrient digestibility, growth and feed conversion across different studies with sheep. Different methodologies and small numbers of studies necessitated the use of the classical effect size method, in which a unitless standardised effect size (Hedges's g) was used to calculate differences obtained in outcomes between supplemented and non-supplemented sheep. Summary statistics across studies were calculated with fixed and random effects models, whereas subgroup-analysis and meta-regression were applied to identify possible interfering factors that could be responsible for between-study variability. Possible publication bias was evaluated with graphical and statistical tests. Effect sizes for ruminal ammonia nitrogen (33 comparisons), pH (42 comparisons) and total volatile fatty acids (38 comparison) did not (P > 0.10) present heterogeneity among studies, and was not affected by yeast supplementation. No effects (P > 0.05) were detected on the stoichiometry of volatile fatty acids or protozoa counts. Effects sizes calculated for digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, acid-detergent fibre and neutral-detergent fibre, which included from 17 to 28 comparisons, showed considerable (>50%) between-study variability. This variability could not effectively be explained by the categorical variables (1) mode of yeast application, (2) feed intake (ad lib versus restricted) or (3) faeces collection method, or the continuous independent variables (1) adaptation period, (2) study period, (3) dietary roughage concentration and (4) dietary crude protein concentration. According to random effects models, digestibility of dry matter, organic matter and crude protein were increased by yeast supplementation, with no effects found for digestibility of fibre components. Substantial unexplained between-study variability (50–90%) was found for growth (13 comparisons) and feed intake (9 comparisons). This meta-analysis presented evidence that addition of dry active S. cerevisiae yeast to diets did not have any effect on growth, feed conversion, ruminal parameters or fibre digestibility in sheep.