Limitations of detection of malignancy in pleural effusions using ELISA-based TRAP assay: comparison with cytological examination

OBJECTIVE: Telomerase is active in almost all cancers from various organs but is not detectable in most normal cells. Thus, telomerase activity might be a universal and specific marker for diagnosing malignancy. The aim was to evaluate the potential use of the ELISA-based TRAP assay to detect malignancy in pleural effusion, and to compare it with conventional cytological examination. METHODS: Using the ELISA-based TRAP assay, telomerase activity was examined in 94 consecutive pleural effusions submitted for cytological examination. RESULTS: According to the results of cytology, the 94 samples were divided into two groups: group I, 79 non-malignant pleural effusions, including group IA, no association with a malignant tumour, a control group (n = 63), and group IB, associated with a malignant tumour (n = 16); and group II, 15 malignant pleural effusions. Telomerase activity was detected in five of 63 samples in group IA (7.9%), four of 16 samples in group IB (25%), and six of 15 samples in group II (40%). All five false-positive effusions were from patients with tuberculosis. Comparing group II with group IA, the TRAP assay showed 40% sensitivity, 92.1% specificity, 54.5% positive and 86.6% negative predictive value, and 82.1% accuracy. However, the detection rate of the TRAP assay (88.9%) was higher than that of the cytological examination (66.7%) in lung cancer-inflicted pleural effusions. CONCLUSION: The ELISA-based TRAP assay is relatively insensitive; therefore, it is unsuitable as a routine diagnostic tool for pleural effusion. False-positive telomerase activity due to lymphocytic contamination may weaken its diagnostic value for malignant effusions in a tuberculosis-endemic area.