首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Comparison of high-dose Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy and Cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy for p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the context of revised HPV-based staging
Authors:Bhattasali Onita  Thompson Lester DR  Abdalla Iman A  Chen Jergin  Iganej Shawn
Institution:1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles Medical Center, 4950 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, USA;2. Department of Pathology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Woodland Hills Medical Center, 5601 De Soto Ave, Woodland Hills, CA, USA;3. Department of Hematology/Oncology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles Medical Center, 1515 North Vermont Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Abstract:Aim: To perform a comparison of Cisplatin vs. Cetuximab in p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) in the context of the revised HPV-based staging.Background: Previous reports comparing these agents in head and neck cancer have included heterogenous disease and p16-status.Materials and methods: A retrospective review was conducted from 2006 to 2016 of patients with p16-positive OPSCC who underwent definitive radiotherapy concurrent with either triweekly Cisplatin (n?=?251) or Cetuximab (n?=?40). AJCC 8th Edition staging was adapted.Results: Median follow-up for surviving patients was 40 months. On multivariate analysis for all-comers, comparing Cisplatin and Cetuximab, 3-year locoregional recurrence (LRR): 6% vs. 16% (p?=?0.07), 3-year distant metastasis (DM): 8% vs. 21% (p?=?0.04), 3-year overall recurrence rate (ORR): 11% vs. 29% (p?=?0.01), and 3-year cause-specific survival (CSS): 94% vs. 79% (p?=?0.06), respectively. On stage-based subgroup analysis, for stage I/>II disease, 3-year LRR: 5% vs. 10% (<em>p</em>?=?0.51), 3-year DM: 7% vs. 16% (<em>p</em>?=?0.32), 3-year ORR: 10% vs. 23% (<em>p</em>?=?0.15), and 3-year CSS: 95% vs. 82% (<em>p</em>?=?0.38). For stage III disease, 3-year LRR: 10% vs. 40% (<em>p</em>?=?0.07), 3-year DM: 9% vs. 43% (<em>p</em>?=?0.07), 3-year ORR: 15% vs. 55% (<em>p</em>?=?0.04), and 3-year CSS: 94% vs. 57% (<em>p</em>?=?0.048).Conclusions: When given concurrently with radiotherapy, Cetuximab and triweekly Cisplatin demonstrated comparable efficacy for AJCC 8th Edition stage I–II p16-positive OPSCC. However, Cetuximab appeared to be associated with higher rates of treatment failure and cancer-related deaths in stage III disease. Upon availability of the RTOG 1016 trial results, analysis based on the revised HPV-based staging should be performed to confirm these findings.</td>
	  </tr> 
	  <tr>
	   <td align=
Keywords:Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma  High-dose cisplatin  Cetuximab  p16-positive  Radiation therapy
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号