Evolution of Xylan Substitution Patterns in Gymnosperms and Angiosperms: Implications for Xylan Interaction with Cellulose

The interaction between cellulose and xylan is important for the load-bearing secondary cell wall of flowering plants. Based on the precise, evenly spaced pattern of acetyl and glucuronosyl (MeGlcA) xylan substitutions in eudicots, we recently proposed that an unsubstituted face of xylan in a 2-fold helical screw can hydrogen bond to the hydrophilic surfaces of cellulose microfibrils. In gymnosperm cell walls, any role for xylan is unclear, and glucomannan is thought to be the important cellulose-binding polysaccharide. Here, we analyzed xylan from the secondary cell walls of the four gymnosperm lineages (Conifer, Gingko, Cycad, and Gnetophyta). Conifer, Gingko, and Cycad xylan lacks acetylation but is modified by arabinose and MeGlcA. Interestingly, the arabinosyl substitutions are located two xylosyl residues from MeGlcA, which is itself placed precisely on every sixth xylosyl residue. Notably, the Gnetophyta xylan is more akin to early-branching angiosperms and eudicot xylan, lacking arabinose but possessing acetylation on alternate xylosyl residues. All these precise substitution patterns are compatible with gymnosperm xylan binding to hydrophilic surfaces of cellulose. Molecular dynamics simulations support the stable binding of 2-fold screw conifer xylan to the hydrophilic face of cellulose microfibrils. Moreover, the binding of multiple xylan chains to adjacent planes of the cellulose fibril stabilizes the interaction further. Our results show that the type of xylan substitution varies, but an even pattern of xylan substitution is maintained among vascular plants. This suggests that 2-fold screw xylan binds hydrophilic faces of cellulose in eudicots, early-branching angiosperm, and gymnosperm cell walls.The plant secondary cell wall is a complex network of various polysaccharides and phenolic compounds that act in concert to provide strength to the cell wall (Kumar et al., 2016). Cellulose, formed of strong crystalline fibrils of linear β1,4 glucan, comprises about 40% of dry plant biomass. The other secondary cell wall polysaccharides, largely xylan and glucomannan, comprise about 30% of dry plant biomass. The abundance and structure of these hemicelluloses vary with plant species and tissues, but they have in common that they are tightly associated with cellulose. It is believed that the most important biological role of hemicelluloses is their contribution to strengthening the cell wall by interaction with cellulose and, in some walls, with lignin (Scheller and Ulvskov, 2010). However, it is unclear how hemicelluloses interact with cellulose in the cell wall (Cosgrove and Jarvis, 2012). In this work, we were interested in the interaction of cellulose with xylan, one of the most abundant polysaccharides in nature.To understand polysaccharide interactions in the cell wall, we need to know not only the hemicellulose primary structure, but also the conformation of the polysaccharide chains. The glucan chains in cellulose are similar to a flat ribbon known as a 2-fold helical screw and associate through lateral hydrogen bonding into sheets. The sheets of glucan chains stack on top of each other, resulting in highly ordered crystalline cellulose. It is still unclear how many glucan chains form a microfibril and whether the microfibril has a hexagonal or rectangular cross section. However, recent studies shed some light onto these questions (Fernandes et al., 2011; Newman et al., 2013; Thomas et al., 2013; Cosgrove, 2014; Oehme et al., 2015; Thomas et al., 2015; Wang and Hong, 2016; Vandavasi et al., 2016). Whichever model is favored, hydrophobic (e.g. 100 or 200) and hydrophilic (e.g. 110 or 010) crystal faces are exposed for interaction with other molecules such as hemicelluloses (Zhao et al., 2014; Cosgrove, 2014; Li et al., 2015).The β1,4 xylan backbone is always further modified, often by acetyl (Ac), arabinosyl (Ara), and glucuronosyl (MeGlcA) side-chain substitutions. These substitutions are supposed to be necessary to maintain xylan solubility (Mikkelsen et al., 2015). Unsubstituted xylan forms crystalline fibers of chains adopting a 3-fold screw helix (Nieduszynski and Marchessault, 1971). Consequently, xylan substitutions are essential for xylan function and vascular plant viability (Mortimer et al., 2010; Xiong et al., 2013, 2015). In vitro experiments and in silico modeling suggest xylan interacts with cellulose, and it is widely accepted that this is partly through interactions on the hydrophobic faces of the cellulose fibrils (Bosmans et al., 2014; Köhnke et al., 2011; Kabel et al., 2007; Busse-Wicher et al., 2014). In contrast to the binding to the hydrophobic faces, the backbones of highly substituted hemicelluloses are thought to be unable to hydrogen bond effectively with the hydrophilic surfaces of cellulose fibrils because of steric hindrance. For example, hydrogen bonding of the xyloglucan backbone to cellulose would be blocked by steric restrictions of the side chains (Finkenstadt et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 2011). How then does the naturally occurring, highly substituted, xylan interact with cellulose? Our recent findings in the eudicot Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) revealed that the majority of xylan bears substitutions solely on alternate xylosyl residues. Every second Xyl is acetylated (Busse-Wicher et al., 2014; Chong et al., 2014), and MeGlcA side chains reside on evenly spaced xylosyl residues, largely at 6-, 8-, 10-, or 12-residue intervals (Bromley et al., 2013). In this scenario, on a xylan backbone in the ribbon-like 2-fold helical screw conformation, all the decorations will face one side, creating an unsubstituted xylan surface. Therefore, in addition to forming stacking interactions on the hydrophobic surface, this xylan structure is compatible with hydrogen bonding to the hydrophilic surface of cellulose (Busse-Wicher et al., 2014; Busse-Wicher et al., 2016).Both xylan and glucomannan are substantial components of vascular plant secondary cell walls (Timell, 1967; Willfor et al., 2005; McKee et al., 2016). In conifers (gymnosperms, Pinales), the main hemicellulose is glucomannan, but eudicots possess relatively little glucomannan (Scheller and Ulvskov, 2010; Huang et al., 2015), and the secondary cell walls are dominated by xylan, suggesting xylan might have adopted additional functions in these flowering plants that produce hardwoods (Dammström et al., 2009). Conifers, providing softwood for the paper, pulp, and construction industries, are of major ecological and economical value. Consequently, understanding the function and architecture of the cell wall components of softwoods and hardwoods is of great importance.To investigate whether the precise arrangement of xylan decorations on evenly spaced xylosyl residues, as seen in eudicots, is a novel feature of hardwood xylan, we analyzed the pattern of xylan substitution in various gymnosperms and angiosperms. In addition to conifers, there are three further gymnosperm lineages: Cycad, Gingko and Gnetophyta (Fig. 1). There has been a debate whether Gnetophyta are the gymnosperm lineage most closely related to the angiosperms (Davis and Schaefer, 2011; Uddenberg et al., 2015). There are few studies across gymnosperm lineages to determine any divergence in the structure of xylans.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Schematic representation of the phylogenetic relationship between gymnosperm and angiosperm species studied in this work. The distances do not correspond to phylogenetic distances.Our work shows that some gymnosperm xylans have decorations and decoration patterns that are different to those of eudicot xylans. Nevertheless, these modifications largely reside on even xylosyl residues on the backbone. Molecular dynamics simulations support the hypothesis that this highly conserved organization of substitutions allows an unsubstituted surface of xylan to bind stably to hydrophilic faces of cellulose fibrils.