首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

三江平原典型小叶章湿地土壤硝化反硝化作用与氧化亚氮排放
引用本文:孙志高,刘景双,杨继松,李新华,周旺明. 三江平原典型小叶章湿地土壤硝化反硝化作用与氧化亚氮排放[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(1): 185-192
作者姓名:孙志高  刘景双  杨继松  李新华  周旺明
作者单位:1. 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所,长春,130012;中国科学院研究生院,北京,100039
2. 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所,长春,130012
基金项目:中国科学院知识创新工程项目;国家自然科学基金
摘    要:
应用C2H2抑制原状土柱培育法研究了三江平原典型小叶章湿地土壤N2O排放速率及反硝化速率的变化,分析了它们与环境因子的关系,并估算了N2O排放量及反硝化损失量.结果表明:草甸沼泽土和腐殖质沼泽土N2O排放速率的变化基本一致,其范围分别为0.020~0.089 kg N·hm-2·d-1和0.012~0.033 kg N·hm-2·d-1,前者的N2O排放速率均明显高于后者(平均为1.79±1.07倍),且其差异达到显著水平(P<0.05);二者反硝化速率的变化并不一致,其范围分别为0.024~0.127 kg N·hm-2·d-1和0.021~0.043 kg N·hm-2·d-1,前者的反硝化速率一般也要高于后者(平均为1.67±1.56倍),但其差异并未达到显著水平(P>0.05);硝化作用在前者N2O排放和氮素损失过程中发挥了重要作用,而反硝化作用则是导致后者N2O排放和氮素损失的重要过程;氮素物质基础不是影响二者硝化-反硝化作用的重要因素;温度对前者硝化 反硝化作用的影响比后者更为明显,其反硝化速率与5、10和15 cm地温均呈显著正相关(P<0.05);二者所处湿地水分条件的差异是导致其N2O排放速率及反硝化速率差异的重要原因.生长季内,前者的N2O排放量和反硝化损失量分别为5.216 kg N·hm-2和6.166 kg N·hm-2,而后者分别为3.196 kg N·hm-2和4.407 kg N·hm-2;在二者的反硝化产物中,N2O/N2的比率最高,分别为5.49和3.76,表明N2在后者反硝化产物中所占的比例明显高于前者,说明季节积水条件会导致N2O/N2比例降低.

关 键 词:N2O排放速率  反硝化速率  硝化-反硝化作用  草甸沼泽土  腐殖质沼泽土
文章编号:1001-9332(2007)01-0185-08
收稿时间:2005-12-31
修稿时间:2005-12-31

Nitrification-denitrification and N2O emission of typical Calamagrostis angustifolia wetland soils in Sanjiang Plain
SUN Zhi-gao,LIU Jing-shuang,YANG Ji-song,LI Xin-hua,ZHOU Wang-ming. Nitrification-denitrification and N2O emission of typical Calamagrostis angustifolia wetland soils in Sanjiang Plain[J]. The journal of applied ecology, 2007, 18(1): 185-192
Authors:SUN Zhi-gao  LIU Jing-shuang  YANG Ji-song  LI Xin-hua  ZHOU Wang-ming
Affiliation:1 Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130012, China ; 2 Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
Abstract:
With intact soil core and by using acetylene inhibition method, this paper measured the N2O emission and denitrification rates of typical Calamagrostis angustifolia wetland soils in Sanjiang Plain, analyzed their relationships with environmental factors, and estimated the total amounts of N2O emission and denitrification loss. The results showed that meadow marsh soil and humus marsh soil had a similar change range of N2O emission rate (0.020-0.089 kg N x hm(2) x d(-1) and 0.012-0.033 kg N x hm(2) x d(-1), respectively), but the former had a much higher N2O emission rate than the latter, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). As for denitrification rate, its change range was 0.024-0.127 kg N x hm(2) x d(-1) for meadow marsh soil and 0.021-0.043 kg N x hm(2) x d(-1) for humus marsh soil. Meadow marsh soil also had a higher denitrification rate than humus marsh soil, but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). In meadow marsh soil, nitrification played an important role in N2O emission and nitrogen loss; while in humus marsh soil, denitrification was the main process inducing N2O emission and nitrogen loss. For these two soils, nitrogenous compounds were not the important factor affecting nitrification-denitrification. In meadow marsh soil, temperature had more evident effect, where nitrification-denitrification had a significant positive correlation with the soil temperature at the depths of 5 cm, 10 cm and 15 cm (P < 0.05). Soil moisture condition was another important factor inducing the difference of N2O emission and denitrification rates. In growth season, the amount of N2O emission and denitrification loss was 5.216 kg N x hm(-2) and 6.166 kg N x hm(-2) for meadow marsh soil, and 3.196 kg N x hm(-2) and 4.407 kg N x hm(-2) for humus marsh soil, respectively. In the denitrification productions of meadow marsh soil and humus marsh soil, the maximum value of N2O/N2 ratio was 5.49 and 3.76, respectively, indicating that the proportion of N2 in denitrification productions was higher in humus marsh soil than in meadow marsh soil, and the seasonal waterlogged condition could induce the decrease of N2O/N2 ratio.
Keywords:N_2O emission rate  denitrification rate  nitrification-denitrification  meadow marsh soil  humus marsh soil
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号