首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Primary platelet signaling cascades and integrin-mediated signaling control ADP-ribosylation factor (Arf) 6-GTP levels during platelet activation and aggregation
Authors:Karim Zubair A  Choi Wangsun  Whiteheart Sidney W
Institution:Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0509, USA.
Abstract:Previous studies showed that ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (Arf6) is important for platelet function; however, little is known about which signaling events regulate this small GTP-binding protein. Arf6-GTP was monitored in platelets stimulated with a number of agonists (TRAP, thrombin, convulxin, collagen, PMA, thapsigargin, or A23187) and all led to a time-dependent decrease in Arf6-GTP. ADP and U46619 were without effect. Using inhibitors, it was shown that the decrease of Arf6-GTP is a direct consequence of known signaling cascades. Upon stimulation via PAR receptors, Arf6-GTP loss could be blocked by treatment with U-73122, BAPTA/AM, Ro-31-8220, or Gö6976, indicating requirements for phospholipase C, calcium, and protein kinase C (PKC) α/β, respectively. The Arf6-GTP decrease in convulxin-stimulated platelets showed similar requirements and was also sensitive to piceatannol, wortmannin, and LY294002, indicating additional requirements for Syk and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. The convulxin-induced decrease was sensitive to both PKCα/β and δ inhibitors. Outside-in signaling, potentially via integrin engagement, caused a second wave of signaling that affected Arf6. Inclusion of RGDS peptides or EGTA, during activation, led to a biphasic response; Arf6-GTP levels partially recovered upon continued incubation. A similar response was seen in β3 integrin-null platelets. These data show that Arf6-GTP decreases in response to known signaling pathways associated with PAR and GPVI. They further reveal a second, aggregation-dependent, process that dampens Arf6-GTP recovery. This study demonstrates that the nucleotide state of Arf6 in platelets is regulated during the initial phases of activation and during the later stages of aggregation.Platelet activation is initiated through several classes of membrane receptors, which are stimulated by agonists produced at the vascular lesion (13). A second wave of signaling, caused by engagement of integrins, occurs as platelets bind to the lesion surface and aggregate (4). Together, these plasma membrane proteins initiate the platelet processes important for thrombosis (e.g. adhesion, spreading, secretion, and clot retraction). Small GTP-binding proteins, specifically members of the Ras superfamily, link signaling events from various platelet receptors to defined outcomes, such as shape change (57), aggregation (8, 9), and secretion (1012). Rab proteins play roles in granule secretion, with Rab4 and Rab6 being involved in alpha granule release (10, 11) and Rab27a/b in dense core granule release (12, 13). RalA is activated in response to various stimuli (1416) and may play a role in secretion by anchoring the exocyst complex to specific membrane sites (17). Rap1 plays a role in integrin αIIbβ3 activation (8, 9). Rho family GTPases (Rho, Rac, and Cdc42) play roles in platelet phosphoinositide signaling and in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton (57). While these small GTP-binding proteins are clearly important to platelet function, it is equally clear that other small G proteins are present and functional in platelets (18).The ADP-ribosylation factor (Arf)2 family are Ras-related, small GTPases that affect both vesicular transport and cytoskeletal dynamics (19, 20). Based on their primary sequences, this family is divided into three classes, with Arf6 as the only member of class III (19). Arf6-GTP is considered the “active state” and can interact with downstream effectors, such as phospholipase D (PLD) (21), phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase type α (22), and arfaptin 2 (23, 24), resulting in the recruitment of these effectors to the plasma membrane. The Arf6 GTP/GDP cycle is mediated by interactions with guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). The large number of Arf-GEF and -GAP proteins have been discussed in recent reviews where it was noted that, unlike other small GTPases, Arf functions are generally not mediated solely by the GTP-bound state but through its cycling between states (19, 20, 25, 26).The effects that Arf6 has on the secretion and actin dynamics in nucleated cells make it an ideal candidate for function in platelets. Arf6 influences cortical actin and is important for spreading, ruffling, migration, and phagocytosis (reviewed in Ref. 19). Our previous work (27) showed that Arf6 is present on platelet membranes and is important for platelet function. Unlike other small G proteins, the Arf6 GTP-bound form is readily detectible in resting platelets and upon activation with collagen or convulxin there is a rapid conversion to the GDP-bound form. Acylated peptides, which mimic the myristoylated N terminus of Arfs have been used as isoform-specific inhibitors (28). In platelets, a myristoylated-Arf6 (myr-Arf6) peptide specifically blocks the activation-dependent loss of Arf6-GTP. This peptide also blocks aggregation, spreading on collagen, and activation of the Rho family of GTPases. Other GTPases, such as Ral and Rap, were unaffected. The simplest explanation for these data is that platelet activation stimulates the GTPase activity of Arf6, perhaps through activation of an Arf6-GAP. Alternatively, platelet activation could affect an Arf6-GEF thus reducing the production of Arf6-GTP. Regardless of mechanism, disruption of the activation-dependent loss of Arf6-GTP, with the myr-Arf6 peptide, profoundly affects the actin-based cytoskeletal rearrangements associated with platelet activation. While our initial report (27) established a role for Arf6 in platelet function, it was not clear what platelet signaling events were required to induce the loss of Arf6-GTP.In this article, we delineate the signaling cascades required for the activation-dependent loss of Arf6-GTP. We show that the Arf6-GTP to -GDP conversion was stimulated by primary agonists (thrombin, TRAP, collagen, or convulxin) but not by ADP or U46619. The decrease in Arf6-GTP, downstream of thrombin and convulxin, required PLC, and PKC activity. Loss of Arf6-GTP, via stimulation of GPVI with convulxin, additionally required Syk and PI3K activities. Pretreatment with passivators, nitric oxide (NO), and prostaglandin I2 (PGI2) blocked thrombin- and convulxin-induced loss of Arf6-GTP. Further experiments suggested a role for “outside-in” signaling, especially once platelet aggregates begin to form. Inclusion of RGDS peptide, EGTA, or the deletion of the β3 integrin had only minimal effects on the initial loss of Arf6-GTP but led to the partial recovery of Arf6-GTP levels. This biphasic change in Arf6-GTP levels was not seen when aggregation was allowed to occur normally. Taken together, these data show that the Arf6 nucleotide state is responsive to both initial agonist-mediated signaling and to a second wave of integrin-mediated signaling that occurs upon aggregation.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号