Seasonal changes in the dissolved free amino acid and DOC concentrations in a hypertrophic African reservoir and its inflowing rivers

Dissolved free amino acid (DFAA) concentration and composition and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration were measured over 16 months at three depths in hypertrophic Hartbeespoort Dam, South Africa and in its two perenially inflowing rivers. The range of DFAA concentrations in the reservoir and both rivers were similar with dominant DFAA consisting of serine, glycine, alanine and ornithine in all three systems. The range of DOC concentrations in the rivers was 1.5–11.1 mg l^–1, the major river (Crocodile) having about twice the DOC concentration of the Magalies River. The DFAA/DOC ratios ranged between 0.02–1.1% in the Crocodile River and 0.13–3.7% in the Magalies River. DFAA and DOC concentrations were positively correlated to the Magalies River flow, but for the Crocodile River, which received domestic and industrial effluents, DOC was inversely correlated to flow. The source of DFAA in both rivers was mainly terrestrial, in contrast to the main DOC source in the Crocodile River which was the effluents. The DFAA load of the Crocodile River ranged between 0.22 and 208 kg C d^–1.DOC (5.0–24.8mg l^–1) in Hartbeespoort Dam generally decreased with depth but DFAA (15–4800 nmol l^–1) concentration showed no clear trend. The DFAA/DOC ratios varied between 0.02 and 2.9%. DFAA concentrations were correlated (r = 0.3, n = 30, p = 0.04) with bacterial numbers at 0 and 10 m only while no significant correlations were found with bacterial production, chlorophyll a concentration and phytoplankton primary and EDOC (extracellular DOC) production at any depth. The rate of bacterial utilization of DFAA was low compared with data from other lakes. Diurnal phytoplankton production of DFAA in the euphotic zone of the whole lake was calculated to vary between 268 and 30 780 t C d^–1 indicating autochthonous DFAA sources were dominant to allochthonous DFAA sources. The autochthonous production of DFAA was > 2 × gross bacterial production of the euphotic zone indicating that although DFAA concentrations were frequently < 10 g C l^–1, the rate of DFAA production exceeded bacterial requirements.