The evolution of meiosis and sexual reproduction |
| |
Authors: | DAVID PENNY |
| |
Institution: | Department of Botany and Zoology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand |
| |
Abstract: | It has been argued that because intermediate states would not be advantageous, it is impossible for natural selection to account for the evolution of meiosis and sexual reproduction. The argument is invalid because a reasonable hypothesis is presented. The hypothesis is developed from a consideration of unicellular eukaryotes and prokaryotes and is that the ancestral eukaryote had a form of parasexual cycle with 'somatic' or 'mitotic' recombination. Later mitosis, then meiosis evolved. In multicellular organisms genetic recombination then usually became restricted to meiosis. Several predictions are made that could be tested in the near future. A conclusion is that we have been misled by treating meiosis and genetic recombination as more or less synonomous. The question of the ultimate origin of recombination is more obscure but it is pointed out that recombination could give the most immediate advantage early in the origin of life, particularly with a hypercycle model. It could result in the combination of advantageous quasi-species (short nucleotidc sequences) into one genome, and it could eliminate ineffective combinations. There are discussions of the scientific role of hypotheses for the origin of complex biological features and on the biological success of cooperative units of DNA. |
| |
Keywords: | Cooperative DNA evolution hypercycles genetic recombination meiosis-mitotic recombination parasexual cycle quasi-species sexual reproduction |
|
|