A theoretical reassessment of microbial maintenance and implications for microbial ecology modeling

We attempted to reconcile three microbial maintenance models (Herbert, Pirt, and Compromise) through a theoretical reassessment. We provided a rigorous proof that the true growth yield coefficient (Y(G) ) is the ratio of the specific maintenance rate (a in Herbert) to the maintenance coefficient (m in Pirt). Other findings from this study include: (1) the Compromise model is identical to the Herbert for computing microbial growth and substrate consumption, but it expresses the dependence of maintenance on both microbial biomass and substrate; (2) the maximum specific growth rate in the Herbert (μ(max,H) ) is higher than those in the other two models (μ(max,P) and μ(max,C) ), and the difference is the physiological maintenance factor (m(q) =?a); and (3) the overall maintenance coefficient (m(T) ) is more sensitive to m(q) than to the specific growth rate (μ(G) ) and Y(G) . Our critical reassessment of microbial maintenance provides a new approach for quantifying some important components in soil microbial ecology models.