Plasticity of the Arabidopsis Root System under Nutrient Deficiencies

Plant roots show a particularly high variation in their morphological response to different nutrient deficiencies. Although such changes often determine the nutrient efficiency or stress tolerance of plants, it is surprising that a comprehensive and comparative analysis of root morphological responses to different nutrient deficiencies has not yet been conducted. Since one reason for this is an inherent difficulty in obtaining nutrient-deficient conditions in agar culture, we first identified conditions appropriate for producing nutrient-deficient plants on agar plates. Based on a careful selection of agar specifically for each nutrient being considered, we grew Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants at four levels of deficiency for 12 nutrients and quantified seven root traits. In combination with measurements of biomass and elemental concentrations, we observed that the nutritional status and type of nutrient determined the extent and type of changes in root system architecture (RSA). The independent regulation of individual root traits further pointed to a differential sensitivity of root tissues to nutrient limitations. To capture the variation in RSA under different nutrient supplies, we used principal component analysis and developed a root plasticity chart representing the overall modulations in RSA under a given treatment. This systematic comparison of RSA responses to nutrient deficiencies provides a comprehensive view of the overall changes in root plasticity induced by the deficiency of single nutrients and provides a solid basis for the identification of nutrient-sensitive steps in the root developmental program.Plant survival and performance are highly dependent on the plant’s ability to efficiently explore the soil in the search for water and minerals. Thus, root growth and architecture are extremely relevant for the plant’s adaptation to the growth medium, as they determine the soil volume that a plant is able to explore at a given time. Root system architecture (RSA) represents the spatial arrangement of roots of different ages and orders (Lynch, 1995; Osmont et al., 2007) and is determined by genetic factors and the integration of environmental cues (Malamy, 2005). The genetic component determines the fundamental morphology and blueprint of a plant’s root system, whereas environmental cues shape root architecture by modifying the intrinsic genetic program. The existence of this additional level of regulation allows plants to display a high level of root plasticity, which reflects the shape, three-dimensional distribution, branching pattern, and age of the primary and postembryonically generated roots (Pacheco-Villalobos and Hardtke, 2012). The dynamic modulation of RSA is based on the intrinsic developmental nature of the different components of the root system. In fact, the primary root (PR) is established during embryogenesis, while the lateral roots (LRs) that originate from the PR develop postembryonically (Osmont et al., 2007; Péret et al., 2009). These highly dynamic changes in the overall RSA throughout time finally determine root plasticity and allow plants to efficiently adapt to environmental constraints.Nutrient availability can exert a profound impact on RSA by altering the number, length, angle, and diameter of roots and root hairs (for review, see Forde and Lorenzo, 2001; López-Bucio et al., 2003; Malamy, 2005; Osmont et al., 2007). In fact, plants can respond to the heterogenous availability of resources by allocating roots where the most favorable conditions are found (Zhang and Forde, 1998; Linkohr et al., 2002; Remans et al., 2006; Lima et al., 2010; Giehl et al., 2012). When grown under limited phosphorus (P) availability, roots exhibit a shallower architecture that results from the inhibition of PR elongation and the concomitant increase in LR formation (Williamson et al., 2001; López-Bucio et al., 2002; Sanchez-Calderon et al., 2005). Such an architectural rearrangement of the root is thought to improve the plant’s ability to forage P from the usually P-enriched topsoil horizon (Lynch and Brown, 2001; Rubio et al., 2003; Zhu et al., 2005). In contrast to low P, reduced nitrogen (N) availability stimulates PR and particularly LR elongation but not LR initiation (Linkohr et al., 2002; López-Bucio et al., 2003). However, it is noteworthy that under severe N shortage, LR formation is almost completely absent (Krouk et al., 2010), suggesting that plants require a certain level of N to sustain an active foraging strategy. These examples indicate that the availability of different nutrients can evoke distinct effects on RSA that depend upon which nutrient is supplied and the concentration of the supplied nutrient.Unfortunately, for the majority of the nutrients, a more detailed analysis of the architectural modifications under deficient conditions is still missing. In fact, most studies describe the effect of nutrient deficiencies on root growth and development only in terms of root biomass or total root length (Hermans and Verbruggen, 2005; Hermans et al., 2006; Richard-Molard et al., 2008; Jung et al., 2009; Cailliatte et al., 2010). Thus, important features of the root system are not comprehensible from these rather basic measurements. The characterization of RSA in more detail appears justified due to the positive correlations found between single root characteristics and plant yield, especially when the supply of water or mineral resources was limited (Landi et al., 2002; Tuberosa et al., 2002; Manschadi et al., 2006; Kirkegaard et al., 2007; Steele et al., 2007). Although a large number of studies have been conducted on the root development of grasses (Hochholdinger and Tuberosa, 2009; Iyer-Pascuzzi et al., 2010; Pacheco-Villalobos and Hardtke, 2012), our understanding of the molecular players involved in the regulation of root growth and development has benefited most from studies of the reference plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) grown under controlled conditions to minimize variability. However, imposing consistent nutrient deficiencies presents an experimental challenge as long as plants are grown on agar medium, which is the method of choice to preserve the spatial arrangement of the root system and access a larger number of root traits.A major drawback of agar and agarose media is their inherent nutrient load, such that traces of nutrient contamination must often be made unavailable to plants, for example by adding chelating agents to lower the free activities of micronutrients (Bell et al., 1991; Yang et al., 1994; Rengel, 1999). Additionally, in many cases, symptoms of deficiency are only observed in mutants impaired in the uptake of the nutrient in question (Tomatsu et al., 2007; Mills et al., 2008; Assunção et al., 2010). In general, gelling agents may contribute considerable amounts of nutrients (Debergh, 1983; Scholten and Pierik, 1998), hampering the occurrence of deficiency for specific nutrients (Jain et al., 2009). Thus, it becomes crucial to select the most suitable gelling agent when particular nutrient deficiencies are to be obtained. This is particularly relevant as strategies depending upon the use of gelling media are being developed to overcome the bottleneck that often limits RSA traits from being characterized in high-throughput phenotyping studies (Iyer-Pascuzzi et al., 2010; Clark et al., 2011).In our approach to compare RSA under different nutrient deficiencies in Arabidopsis plants grown on solid medium, we first identified the most appropriate conditions for producing nutrient-deficient plants on agar plates. Once identified, these conditions allowed us to characterize the effects of 12 deficiencies at four intensity levels on the RSA by measuring seven root traits. These measurements, in combination with biomass and elemental concentrations, allowed us to determine the nutrient-specific effects on particular parameters of the RSA and thus to describe the root plasticity of Arabidopsis and analyze the underlying traits under different nutrient deficiencies.