首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


A reassessment of historical records of avian introductions to Australia: no case for propagule pressure
Authors:Michael P Moulton  Wendell P Cropper Jr  Linda E Moulton  Michael L Avery  David Peacock
Institution:(1) Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, PO Box 110430, Gainesville, FL 32611-0430, USA;(2) School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, PO Box 110410, Gainesville, FL 32611-0410, USA;(3) USDA Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 2820 East University Avenue, Gainesville, FL 32641, USA;(4) Natural Resources Management Biosecurity Unit, Biosecurity SA, GPO Box 1671, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
Abstract:Introduced species are widely believed to represent a significant threat to conservation of biological diversity. A better understanding of the ecological factors associated with successful species establishment should lead to improved management and mitigation of these introductions. The “propagule pressure hypothesis”, implying a greater chance of successful introduction with greater numbers introduced, has been widely accepted as a principal ecological factor in explaining establishment of exotic species. The historical record of bird introductions in a few locations, including the state of Victoria in Australia, has been advanced as the principal quantitative support for the hypothesis. We compiled lists of bird species introductions into Australia from several sources, and discovered inconsistencies in the records of introductions. In a series of comparisons, we found that the historical record of passerine introductions to Australia does not support the propagule pressure hypothesis unless superfluous introductions of already successful species are included. An additional problem with previous analyses is the inclusion of unsuccessful haphazard cage escapes.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号