Rho GTPases Modulate Entry of Ebola Virus and Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Pseudotyped Vectors

To explore mechanisms of entry for Ebola virus (EBOV) glycoprotein (GP) pseudotyped virions, we used comparative gene analysis to identify genes whose expression correlated with viral transduction. Candidate genes were identified by using EBOV GP pseudotyped virions to transduce human tumor cell lines that had previously been characterized by cDNA microarray. Transduction profiles for each of these cell lines were generated, and a significant positive correlation was observed between RhoC expression and permissivity for EBOV vector transduction. This correlation was not specific for EBOV vector alone as RhoC also correlated highly with transduction of vesicular stomatitis virus GP (VSVG) pseudotyped vector. Levels of RhoC protein in EBOV and VSV permissive and nonpermissive cells were consistent with the cDNA gene array findings. Additionally, vector transduction was elevated in cells that expressed high levels of endogenous RhoC but not RhoA. RhoB and RhoC overexpression significantly increased EBOV GP and VSVG pseudotyped vector transduction but had minimal effect on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) GP pseudotyped HIV or adeno-associated virus 2 vector entry, indicating that not all virus uptake was enhanced by expression of these molecules. RhoB and RhoC overexpression also significantly enhanced VSV infection. Similarly, overexpression of RhoC led to a significant increase in fusion of EBOV virus-like particles. Finally, ectopic expression of RhoC resulted in increased nonspecific endocytosis of fluorescent dextran and in formation of increased actin stress fibers compared to RhoA-transfected cells, suggesting that RhoC is enhancing macropinocytosis. In total, our studies implicate RhoB and RhoC in enhanced productive entry of some pseudovirions and suggest the involvement of actin-mediated macropinocytosis as a mechanism of uptake of EBOV GP and VSVG pseudotyped viral particles.Enveloped viruses enter cells by a variety of different pathways. Productive internalization of enveloped viruses with targeted cells is mediated through interactions of the viral glycoprotein(s) (GPs) with moieties on the surface of the cell. In general, enveloped viral entry occurs through viral adherence to the cell surface, interaction with a specific plasma membrane-associated receptor that results in a series of GP conformational changes leading to fusion of viral and cellular membranes, and delivery of the viral core particle into the cytoplasm. Fusion of the two membranes can occur at the plasma membrane or by uptake of the intact virions into endosomes with subsequent membrane fusion between the viral membrane and the lipid bilayer of the endocytic vesicle. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is an example of a virus that fuses directly to the plasma membrane (5), whereas influenza virus must be internalized into acidified vesicles where the appropriate GP conformational changes can occur, mediating membrane fusion (21). Most enveloped viruses that enter through vesicles utilize a low-pH environment to mediate the necessary conformational changes in GP that induce membrane fusion (37).Ebola virus (EBOV) and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) are enveloped, single-stranded, negative-sense RNA viruses belonging to the families Filoviridae and Rhabdoviridae, respectively. Though they share similarity in genome organization and a broad tropism for a variety of cell types, they differ greatly in their pathogenicities (29, 39). EBOV causes severe hemorrhagic fever that is frequently fatal, whereas VSV infects mainly livestock, generating fluid-filled vesicles on mucosal surfaces.Interestingly, the receptor(s) that mediate entry of these two viruses have yet to be definitively identified. C-type lectins such as DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR are thought to serve as adherence factors for EBOV (26). Other plasma membrane-associated proteins have been implicated in EBOV uptake including folate receptor alpha and the tyrosine kinase receptor Axl (6, 35, 36, 38), but the physical interaction of EBOV GP and these proteins has not been demonstrated, and cells that do not express these proteins are permissive for EBOV GP-mediated virion uptake. VSV was shown to bind ubiquitously to cells via phosphatidylserine (PS) (31). However, a more recent study reports that PS is not a receptor for VSV as no correlation was found between cell surface PS levels and VSV infection, and annexin V, which binds specifically to PS, did not inhibit infection of VSV (9).Both viruses enter cells through a low-pH-dependent, endocytosis-mediated process. A large body of evidence indicates that VSV is internalized via clathrin-coated pits, with a reduction in pH mediating reversible alterations in the GP leading to membrane fusion (40). EBOV may also enter cells by clathrin-mediated endocytosis (30), but lipid raft-associated, caveolin-mediated endocytosis has also been proposed as a mechanism of EBOV uptake (11). Low-pH events lead to cathepsin-dependent cleavage of EBOV GP that is required for productive uptake of the virus (8, 19, 33). Other low-pH-dependent events have been postulated to be required as well (33).To identify genes whose expression correlated with EBOV GP-dependent transduction, we compared the relative transduction efficiency of EBOV GP pseudotyped virions on a panel of human tumor cell lines with gene expression data from cDNA microarrays developed for the same panel of cell lines (20). The gene array data are available from the Developmental Therapeutics Program at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) website (http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/). A significant correlation was observed between expression of RhoC, a member of the small GTP-binding Rho GTPase family, and permissivity for EBOV transduction. Surprisingly, a significant correlation was also observed between VSV glycoprotein (VSVG)-mediated transduction and RhoC expression. In this study, we report that modulation of RhoC expression by transfection of expression plasmids or treatment with an inhibitor alters transduction by virions pseudotyped with either EBOV GP or VSVG and fusion of EBOV virus-like particles (VLPs). RhoC expression also significantly enhanced wild-type VSV infection. We also examine the differential effect each Rho GTPase has on nonspecific endocytotic uptake of exogenous material and on organization of the actin filament. Our findings suggest that RhoC enhances entry of EBOV GP and VSVG pseudovirions through modulation of fluid-phase endocytosis.