RESTRICTION FRAGMENT ANALYSIS OF CHLOROPLAST DNA AND THE SYSTEMATICS OF VIGUIERA AND RELATED GENERA (ASTERACEAE: HELIANTHEAE) |
| |
Authors: | Edward E. Schilling Robert K. Jansen |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Botany, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996-1100 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Box U-42, Storrs, Connecticut, 06268 |
| |
Abstract: | Phylogenetic relationships among 31 species representing variously Helianthus, Helianthopsis, Heliomeris, Simsia, Viguiera, and Tithonia were assessed by chloroplast DNA restriction site mapping. A total of 147 mutations including 92 informative ones was detected using 16 restriction enzymes, with an estimated sequence divergence within the group of 1.4%. Parsimony analysis produced a single most parsimonious tree with a length of 161 steps and a consistency index of 0.91. Statistically significant clades, as assessed by the bootstrap method, correspond to a number of taxa recognized previously, including Helianthus (3 species), Helianthopsis (5 species), and several groups within Viguiera, including sect. Maculatae (4 species), the Baja California group (6 species), sect. Paradosa (2 species) and V. dentata (3 samples). However, species of Viguiera collectively form a highly paraphyletic group relative to species of other genera. Helianthus and Helianthopsis were separated into different clades, supporting their recent segregation. Placement of H. porteri in Helianthus rather than Heliomeris was confirmed; the single sample of the latter genus was most similar to the Baja California group of Viguiera. An expected relationship between Simsia (2 species) and one member of Viguiera ser. Grammatoglossae was confirmed (although not with two other putatively related members of Viguiera) and an unexpected relationship between Simsia and Tithonia was suggested. The presence of Mexican taxa as the more basal groups in the tree points toward a possible Mexican origin for Viguiera and related genera. A molecular clock hypothesis is rejected in many pairwise comparisons involving woody taxa with herbaceous ones, although it could not be rejected in most pairwise comparisons involving taxa of similar habit. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|