首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

筛选MDA-MB-231乳腺癌耐药细胞株两种方法的比较
引用本文:应葳,王苏梦,孙玉洁.筛选MDA-MB-231乳腺癌耐药细胞株两种方法的比较[J].国外医学:分子生物学分册,2011(3):225-231.
作者姓名:应葳  王苏梦  孙玉洁
作者单位:[1]南京医科大学江苏省人类功能基因组重点实验室,南京市210029 [2]南京医科大学细胞生物学系,南京市210029 [3]南京医科大学肿瘤中心,南京市210029
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(No.30870978)
摘    要:目的 比较间歇刺激法和浓度梯度递增法对雌激素受体(estrogen receptor,ER)阴性的乳腺癌耐药细胞株的建立,为进一步探讨ER阴性乳腺癌可能的耐药机制.方法 采用间歇刺激法和浓度梯度递增法,用紫杉醇诱导6个月,分别建立了耐药细胞系231 TIM10和231 TAX8,并用倒置相差显微镜、MTT法、Western印迹、流式细胞术比较了两株耐药细胞的形态学变化、耐药表型、ER-α蛋白表达及紫杉醇诱导细胞G2/M期阻滞效应的改变等生物学特性.结果 间歇刺激法比浓度梯度递增法更容易诱导ER阴性的乳腺癌细胞获得耐药表型,231 TIM10耐药指数为11.9,231 TAX8耐药指数为2.3.用紫杉醇处理后,231 TIM10细胞能够抵抗100 nmol/L紫杉醇引起的G2/M期阻滞效应,231 TAX8细胞仅能够抵抗10 nmol/L紫杉醇引起的G2/M期阻滞效应.231 TIM10细胞在诱导过程中形成了两个细胞亚群,体积增大明显,细胞之间黏连更加明显.MDA-MB-231敏感细胞和两株耐药细胞均无ER-α蛋白的表达.结论 间歇刺激法更合理地模拟了临床上ER阴性乳腺癌的耐药过程,建立了可靠的细胞耐药模型,为耐药机制研究建立了基础.

关 键 词:间歇刺激法  浓度梯度递增法  紫杉醇耐药  乳腺癌细胞  比较研究

Comparison of Two Methods in Establishing MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Resistant Cell Lines
Authors:YING Wei  WANG Sumeng  SUN Yujie
Institution:1Key Laboratory of Human Functional Genomics of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing, 210029, China 2Department of Cell Biology, Nanjing , 210029, China 3 Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention & Treatment, Cancer Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing , 210029, China)
Abstract:Objective To compare two methods of pulse selection and stepwise exposure in establishment of ER-negative breast cancer resistant cell lines, and further study the resistant mechanisms of ER-negative breast cancer. Methods Paclitaxel-resistant cell lines 231 TIM10 and 231 TAX8 were established by pulse selection and stepwise exposure for 6 months. Morphological changes of the resistant cells were observed by confocal microscopy. Resistant phenotype was examined by MTF assay. Paclitaxel-induced mitotic arrest was determined by flow cytometric analysis. ER-α expression was detected by western blotting. Results 231 TIM10 variants acquired higher drug resist- ance than 231 TAX8 variants. 231 TIM10 had 11.9-fold resistance (RI = 11.9) and 231 TAX8 got 2.3-fold resistance (RI = 2.3), compared to parental MDA-MB-231 cells. 231 TIM10 could attenuate 100nM paclitaxel-induced mitotic arrest, while 231 TAX8 could only attenuate 10 nmol/L paclitaxel-induced mitotic arrest. 231 TIM10 formed two subgroups of cell populations, showing apparently bigger size and becoming more adhesive. No ER-α expression was detected in these two resist- ant cell lines and their parental MDA-MB-231 cells. Conclusion Pulse selection reflected the clinical settings of ER-negative breast cancer acquiring drug resistance, which established reliable resist- ant cell models for further study of drug resistant mechanism of breast cancer.
Keywords:pulse selection  stepwise exposure  paclitaxel resistance  breast cancer cells  comparative method
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号