The coleoptile chloroplast: Distinct distribution of xanthophyll cycle pigments,and enrichment in Photosystem II

Recent studies have shown that coleoptile chloroplasts operate the xanthophyll cycle, and that their zeaxanthin concentration co-varies with their sensitivity to blue light. The present study characterized the distribution of photosynthetic pigments in thylakoid pigment–protein complexes from dark-adapted and light-treated coleoptile and mesophyll chloroplasts, the low temperature fluorescence emission spectra, and the rates of PS I and PS II electron transport in both types of chloroplasts from 5-day-old corn seedlings. Pigments were extracted from isolated PS I holocomplex, LHC IIb trimeric and LHC II monomeric complexes and analyzed by HPLC. Chlorophyll distribution in coleoptile thylakoids showed 31% of the total collected Chl in PS I and 65% in the light harvesting complexes of PS II. In mesophyll thylakoids, the values were 44% and 54%, respectively. Mesophyll and coleoptile PS I holocomplexes differed in their Chl t a/Chl t b ratios (8.1 and 6.1, respectively) and -carotene content. In contrast, mesophyll and coleoptile LHC IIb trimers and LHC II monomers had similar Chl t a/Chl t b ratios and -carotene content. The three analyzed pigment–protein complexes from dark-adapted coleoptile chloroplasts contained zeaxanthin, whereas there was no detectable zeaxanthin in the complexes from dark-adapted mesophyll chloroplasts. In both chloroplast types, zeaxanthin and antheraxanthin increased markedly in the three pigment–protein complexes upon illumination, while violaxanthin decreased. In mesophyll thylakoids, zeaxanthin distribution as a percentage of the xanthophyll cycle pool was: LHC II monomers > LHC IIb trimers > PS I holocomplex, and in coleoptile thylakoids, it was: LHC IIb trimers > LHC II monomers = PS I holocomplex. Low temperature (77 K) fluorescence emission spectra showed that the 686 nm emission of coleoptile chloroplasts was approximately 50% larger than that of mesophyll chloroplasts when normalized at 734 nm. The pigment and fluorescence analysis data suggest that there is relatively more PS II per PS I and more LHC I per CC I in coleoptile chloroplasts than in mesophyll chloroplasts. Measurements of t in vitro uncoupled photosynthetic electron transport showed approximately 60% higher rates of electron flow through PS II in coleoptile chloroplasts than in mesophyll chloroplasts. Electron transport rates through PS I were similar in both chloroplast types. Thus, when compared to mesophyll chloroplasts, coleoptile chloroplasts have a distinct PS I pigment composition, a distinct chlorophyll distribution between PS I and PS II, a distinct zeaxanthin percentage distribution among thylakoid pigment–protein complexes, a higher PS II-related fluorescence emission, and higher PS II electron transport capacity. These characteristics may be associated with a sensory transducing role of coleoptile chloroplasts.