Adenovirus-Based Vaccines: Comparison of Vectors from Three Species of Adenoviridae

In order to better understand the broad applicability of adenovirus (Ad) as a vector for human vaccine studies, we compared four adenovirus (Ad) vectors from families C (Ad human serotype 5 HAdV-5; here referred to as AdHu5]), D (HAdV-26; here referred to as AdHu26), and E (simian serotypes SAdV-23 and SAdV-24; here referred to as chimpanzee serotypes 6 and 7 AdC6 and AdC7, respectively]) of the Adenoviridae. Seroprevalence rates and titers of neutralizing antibodies to the two human-origin Ads were found to be higher than those reported previously, especially in countries of sub-Saharan Africa. Conversely, prevalence rates and titers to AdC6 and AdC7 were markedly lower. Healthy human adults from the United States had readily detectable circulating T cells recognizing Ad viruses, the levels of which in some individuals were unexpectedly high in response to AdHu26. The magnitude of T-cell responses to AdHu5 correlated with those to AdHu26, suggesting T-cell recognition of conserved epitopes. In mice, all of the different Ad vectors induced CD8⁺ T-cell responses that were comparable in their magnitudes and cytokine production profiles. Prime-boost regimens comparing different combinations of Ad vectors failed to indicate that the sequential use of Ad vectors from distinct families resulted in higher immune responses than the use of serologically distinct Ad vectors from the same family. Moreover, the transgene product-specific antibody responses induced by the AdHu26 and AdC vectors were markedly lower than those induced by the AdHu5 vector. AdHu26 vectors and, to a lesser extent, AdC vectors induced more potent Ad-neutralizing antibody responses. These results suggest that the potential of AdHu26 as a vaccine vector may suffer from limitations similar to those found for vectors based on other prevalent human Ads.Due to their ability to induce potent transgene product-specific B- and T-cell responses, replication-defective adenovirus (Ad) vectors are being explored for use as carriers of vaccines for a variety of pathogens, including human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) (7), Plasmodium falciparum (9), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (20). Initial enthusiasm for the use of Ad vectors based on Ad human serotype 5 (AdHu5) was dampened by the finding that preexisting antibodies to this virus, which are found in ∼40% of humans residing in the United States and up to 90% of humans residing in some African countries (28), can reduce transgene product-specific immune responses (16) by reducing vector uptake (19). Enthusiasm further decreased after the phase IIb STEP trial, in which an AdHu5 vector was tested for induction of protection in cohorts at high risk for HIV-1 infection. The vector failed to show efficacy in reducing acquisition rates or lowering viral loads in individuals who became infected and instead appeared to increase susceptibility to infection in humans with preexisting neutralizing antibodies to the vaccine carrier (4). As a result of these setbacks, the use of Ad vectors based on other less common serotypes of human Ads (1) or Ads isolated from different species, such as chimpanzees (21, 25), bovines (24), and canines (31), to circumvent preexisting neutralizing antibodies is being explored. Of these, vectors based on adenovirus family D (AdHu26) were shown to have a low seroprevalence in some countries (1) and are now viewed as promising carriers for Ad vector-based gene transfer.A number of studies showed that AdHu26 vectors are highly immunogenic in nonhuman primates (NHPs), where they induced potent transgene product-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses (13) that, when they were combined in a prime-boost regimen with an AdHu5 vector expressing gag of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), achieved a sustained reduction in viral loads upon SIV challenge of vaccinated animals (14). Intriguingly, AdHu26 vectors have been shown to induce a CD8⁺ T-cell response in NHPs that is qualitatively superior to that induced by AdHu5 vectors. AdHu26-induced CD8⁺ T cells showed a broader response, recognizing more epitopes within the transgene product, and had a more polyfunctional response, in that vector-induced individual CD8⁺ T cells produced multiple factors rather than predominantly gamma interferon (IFN-γ) only (13). This suggests that AdHu26 may have fundamental differences in immunogenicity from other Ad vectors.To elucidate this further, we developed a molecular clone of AdHu26 and a number of recombinant AdHu26 vectors from which E1 was deleted and used these to test human samples for the prevalence of AdHu26-neutralizing antibodies and responding CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells. In addition, we conducted a series of studies with mice to determine if this species showed an immune response to a transgene product delivered by an AdHu26 vector markedly different from that induced by the same transgene product delivered by other Ad vectors. Our results showed that AdHu26, strictly speaking, is not a rare serotype, especially in African countries, where the seroprevalence rates of antibodies to AdHu26 are high. Similarly, most humans carry AdHu26-reactive T cells, which in some individuals are present at very high frequencies. In mice, AdHu26 induces potent CD8⁺ T-cell responses that are quantitatively and qualitatively similar to those induced by other Ad vectors. AdHu26 and chimpanzee-origin Ad (AdC) vectors stimulated only marginal transgene product-specific B-cell responses in comparison to those stimulated by AdHu5 vectors but induced more potent neutralizing antibodies to their capsid antigens.