首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Simple additive effects are rare: a quantitative review of plant biomass and soil process responses to combined manipulations of CO2 and temperature
Authors:Feike A Dijkstra  Frank Hagedorn  Mark J Hovenden  Klaus S Larsen  Jack A Morgan  Astrid Volder  Claus Beier  Jeffrey S Dukes  John King  Sebastian Leuzinger  Sune Linder  Yiqi Luo  Ram Oren  Paolo De Angelis  David Tingey  Marcel R Hoosbeek  Ivan A Janssens
Institution:1. Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney, , Sydney, 2015 NSW, Australia;2. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), , Birmensdorf, 8903 Switzerland;3. School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, , Hobart, Tasmania, 7001 Australia;4. Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, , Kgs, Lyngby, 2800 Denmark;5. Rangeland Resources Research Unit, USDA‐ARS, , Fort Collins, CO, 80526 USA;6. Department. of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University, , College Station, TX, 77843 USA;7. Department of Forestry and Natural Resources and Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, , West Lafayette, IN, 47907‐2061 USA;8. Research Group of Plant and Vegetation Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, , Wilrijk, B‐2610 Belgium;9. Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, , Raleigh, NC, 27695 USA;10. Forest Ecology, Department of Environmental Sciences, ETH Zurich, , Zurich, CH‐8092 Switzerland;11. The Institute of Botany, University of Basel, , Basel, 6CH‐4056 Switzerland;12. Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, SLU, , Alnarp, SE‐230 53 Sweden;13. Department of Botany and Microbiology, University of Oklahoma, , Norman, OK, 73069 USA;14. Division of Environmental Science & Policy, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, , Durham, NC, 27708‐0328 USA;15. The Department of Forest Ecology & Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), , Ume?, SE‐901 83 Sweden;16. DIBAF Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro‐food and Forest systems, University of Tuscia, , Viterbo, I‐01100 Italy;17. David Tingey, , OR, Corvallis, 97330 USA;18. Department of Environmental Sciences, Earth System Science – Climate Change, Wageningen University, , Wageningen, 6700AA The Netherlands
Abstract:In recent years, increased awareness of the potential interactions between rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations ( CO2 ]) and temperature has illustrated the importance of multifactorial ecosystem manipulation experiments for validating Earth System models. To address the urgent need for increased understanding of responses in multifactorial experiments, this article synthesizes how ecosystem productivity and soil processes respond to combined warming and CO2 ] manipulation, and compares it with those obtained in single factor CO2 ] and temperature manipulation experiments. Across all combined elevated CO2 ] and warming experiments, biomass production and soil respiration were typically enhanced. Responses to the combined treatment were more similar to those in the CO2 ]‐only treatment than to those in the warming‐only treatment. In contrast to warming‐only experiments, both the combined and the CO2 ]‐only treatments elicited larger stimulation of fine root biomass than of aboveground biomass, consistently stimulated soil respiration, and decreased foliar nitrogen (N) concentration. Nonetheless, mineral N availability declined less in the combined treatment than in the CO2 ]‐only treatment, possibly due to the warming‐induced acceleration of decomposition, implying that progressive nitrogen limitation (PNL) may not occur as commonly as anticipated from single factor CO2 ] treatment studies. Responses of total plant biomass, especially of aboveground biomass, revealed antagonistic interactions between elevated CO2 ] and warming, i.e. the response to the combined treatment was usually less‐than‐additive. This implies that productivity projections might be overestimated when models are parameterized based on single factor responses. Our results highlight the need for more (and especially more long‐term) multifactor manipulation experiments. Because single factor CO2 responses often dominated over warming responses in the combined treatments, our results also suggest that projected responses to future global warming in Earth System models should not be parameterized using single factor warming experiments.
Keywords:[   CO2      ] enrichment  biomass     C sequestration  elevated temperature  manipulation experiments  multifactor experiments  nitrogen availability  soil respiration
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号