首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Defining the Minimal Important Difference for the Visual Analogue Scale Assessing Dyspnea in Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusions
Authors:Eleanor K Mishra  John P Corcoran  Robert J Hallifax  John Stradling  Nicholas A Maskell  Najib M Rahman
Institution:1. Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine and Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.; 2. University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.; Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, INDIA,
Abstract:

Background

The minimal important difference (MID) is essential for interpreting the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Despite a number of RCTs in patients with malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) which use the visual analogue scale for dyspnea (VASD) as an outcome measure, the MID has not been established.

Methods

Patients with suspected MPE undergoing a pleural procedure recorded their baseline VASD and their post-procedure VASD (24 hours after the pleural drainage), and in parallel assessed their breathlessness on a 7 point Likert scale.

Findings

The mean decrease in VASD in patients with a MPE reporting a ‘small but just worthwhile decrease’ in their dyspnea (i.e. equivalent to the MID) was 19mm (95% CI 14-24mm). The mean drainage volume required to produce a change in VASD of 19mm was 760ml.

Interpretation

The mean MID for the VASD in patients with a MPE undergoing a pleural procedure is 19mm (95% CI 14-24mm). Thus choosing an improvement of 19mm in the VASD would be justifiable in the design and analysis of future MPE studies.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号