| Abstract: | We experimentally disturbed stones in three streams of different sizes and followed the macroinvertebrate colonization process in terms of abundance, species richness and similarity over 64 days. We hypothesized that colonization in the smallest and in the largest streams would be slower than in the medium‐sized stream. The small upstream pool of colonists available in the smallest stream could restrict colonization, while in the largest stream predation by the diverse fish assemblage could restrict drifting colonists. The medium‐sized stream did not have these two constraints. We found similar colonization patterns in all three streams, leading to the rejection of the stated hypotheses. Lack of support of the original hypothesis might be due to the weakness of the two hypothesized restrictions on colonization. In addition, colonization by crawling species from undisturbed nearby patches might be of significant importance. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim) |
