Influence of surface anesthesia on the pressure pain threshold measured with different-sized probes |
| |
| Authors: | Ken Takahashi Toru Taguchi Kazunori Itoh Kaoru Okada Kenji Kawakita |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Japan Foundation for Aging and Health, Aichi, Japan;2. Department of Neural Regulation, Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan;3. Department of Neural Regulation, Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan;4. Department of Physiology, Meiji University of Oriental Medicine, Kyoto, Japan |
| |
| Abstract: | Transcutaneous pressure with pressure probes of arbitrary diameters have been commonly used for measuring the threshold and magnitude of muscle pain, yet this procedure lacks scientific validation. To examine the valid probe dimensions, we conducted physiological experiments using 34 human subjects. Pin-prick pain, pressure pain threshold (PPT) to pressure probes of various diameters, heat pain threshold, and electrical pain threshold of deep tissues were measured before and after application of surface lidocaine anesthesia to the skin surface over the brachioradial muscle in a double-blinded manner. The anesthesia neither affected PPT with larger probes (diameters: 1.6 and 15?mm) nor increased electric pain threshold of deep structures, whereas it diminished pain count in pin-prick test and PPT with a 1.0?mm diameter probe, suggesting that mechanical pain thresholds measured with 1.6 and 15?mm probes reflect the pain threshold of deep tissues, possibly muscle. Pain thresholds to heat did not change after application of the anesthesia. These results suggest that larger pressure probes can give a better estimation of muscular pain threshold. |
| |
| Keywords: | Muscle pain cutaneous pain mechanical pain transcutaneous pressure pressure pain test transdermal lidocaine |
|
|
