CNDO/2 calculations of the relative stability of poly (l-proline I) and poly (l-proline II)

The CNDO/2 method using the tight binding approximation for polymers was applied to poly(l-proline I) and poly(l-proline II). The calculations were also carried out for poly(l-alanines) and model molecules which have the same backbone geometrics as those of poly(l-prolines). The results obtained show that both forms of poly(l-proline I) and poly(l-proline II) have nearly the same energy in agreement with experimental results. From the analysis of the total energy, it was found that the intrasegment energy of poly(l-proline II) was lower than that of poly(l-proline I) while the intersegment energy of poly(l-proline I) was lower than that of poly(l-proline II). This result can be considered to correspond well with the experimental fact that poly(l-proline II) is more stable in good or polar solvents and poly(l-proline I) in poor or non-polar solvents. The analysis of the total energy of poly(l-proline) leads us to the conclusion that the α and β carbons play an important role in determining the relative stability between poly(l-proline I) and poly(l-proline II) and the γ carbon does hvae a marked effect on the electronic structures of the polymers in question. This conclusion was also confirmed by comparison of the electronic structures of poly(l-prolines) with those of poly(l-alanines) and model compounds concerned.