| Abstract: | The delipidated protein component of bovine serum high density lipoprotein was fractionated by gel filtration on a Sephadex G-150 column (equilibrated with buffer containing 6 M urea) into three fractions: I, II and III. Fractions I and II together constitute 88% of all the protein weight of bovine high density lipoprotein, whereas fraction III accounts for the remaining 12%. Analysis of the fractions by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide electrophoresis reveals that fraction I consists mostly of aggregated forms of fraction II and some higher molecular weight species, probably irreversible aggregates of fraction II. The irreversible aggregates are apparently formed during the delipidation procedure or upon aging of the lipoprotein. The major protein component of the high density bovine lipoprotein is found in fraction II; it has a molecular weight of 27 000 plus or minus 1500 and appears to be homogeneous by several physicochemical criteria. The amino acid composition of fractions I and II are essentially identical; their spectral properties, including absorption, fluorescence, and circular dichroism spectra, are similar; however, fraction I appears to contain traces of oxidized lipid and more secondary alpha-helical organization than fraction II. By comparison with the intact lipoprotein, which contains about 65% of alpha-helical structure, fractions I and II have diminished alpha-helical organization, 55% and 43%, respectively. Fraction III, on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide electrophoresis, separates into two protein bands of equivalent intensity, having molecular weights around 13 000 and 11 000. Fraction III is markedly distinct from the other two, in amino acid composition and spectral properties, especially in its red-shifted fluorescence and very low content of alpha-helical structure. The protein composition of bovine serum high density lipoprotein is compared with recently published results for high density lipoprotein apoproteins of man, chimpanzee, rhesus monkey, pig and rat. Similarities and differences are discussed in terms of possible evolutionary and functional factors. |
