New concepts in the law of the sea |
| |
| Authors: | John Lawrence Hargrove |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Director of Studies, American Society of International Law ,;2. Professorial Lecturer, The Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies ,;3. Formerly Senior Adviser for International Law, United States Mission to the United Nations , |
| |
| Abstract: | Abstract Current ocean law negotiations reflect conflicts between two old and competing approaches: the view that the coastal state should control activities in any large adjacent ocean area, and the view that most of the ocean should be left open to the free use of all nations. Both approaches are laissez‐faire, leave the distribution of benefits to arbitrary factors, and are based on national exclusivity. In the negotiations this conflict is exhibited in competing claims regarding navigation, mineral resources, fishing, environmental protection, and strategic uses. A possible resolution has emerged in the concept of the whole ocean as a common resource of humankind, according to which no individual state has a right to benefit from the ocean except pursuant to arrangements sanctioned by the community, and rights to benefit are determined not arbitrarily but by membership in the community. The regime now likeliest to be produced by such an approach includes (1) a narrow territorial sea and various navigation guarantees, (2) a wide coastal band coupling coastal state managerial functions with permanent international prerogatives, and (3) purely international manage‐ment of the deep seabed. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
