| Abstract: | In natural populations on Isle Royale, tadpoles of the chorus frog live in small pools on the shore of Lake Superior. Hatchling densities are high and sufficient to cause competitive impact on survivorship, growth, and development. The temporal and spatial pattern of egg laying indicates that tadpoles in many of the pools belong to single sibships. I calculated average coefficients of relationship among tadpoles under the assumption that eggs laid together are the products of the same breeding pair; the coefficients indicate that relationship among competing larvae averages approximately 0.35, and varies widely among larval subpopulations, from less than 0.1 to about 0.5. Two growth experiments were carried out in pens to test whether growth trajectories and larval characteristics at metamorphosis are influenced by relationship among competing tadpoles. In both experiments, initial density was crossed with average relationship; relationship was controlled by varying the number of sibships per pen from one to four. The same sibships were used in both experiments, but one experiment had lower initial densities and less water volume per pen than the other. In both experiments, density reduced growth, developmental rate, size at metamorphosis, survivorship to the onset of metamorphosis, and the proportion of survivors which actually attained metamorphosis by the end of the experiment. Kin effects occurred only in the experiment carried out in small pens at high initial densities: in this experiment, pure sib populations grew faster, and a higher proportion attained metamorphosis. However, there were no kin effects on larval period or body size at metamorphosis. The chorus frog appears to have a population structure conducive to kin-group selection. Furthermore, high variance in the average coefficient of relationship among pools should favor kin recognition and kin-specific interference behavior. The growth experiments suggest that the tadpoles respond to the genetic relationship of competitors, with significant effects on the distribution of fitness at metamorphosis among members of the group. |
