首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Multi-institutional evaluation using the end-to-end test for implementation of dynamic techniques of radiation therapy in Thailand
Authors:Lalida Tuntipumiamorn  Puangpen Tangboonduangjit  Taweap Sanghangthum  Rattapol Rangseevijitprapa  Chirasak Khamfongkhruea  Thida Niyomthai  Boonrut Vuttiprasertpong  Supranee Supanant  Nongnuch Chatchaipaiboon  Porntip Iampongpaiboon  Pitchayut Nakkrasae  Tanwiwat Jaikuna
Institution:1. Division of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand;2. Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand;3. Division of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand;4. Division of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand;5. Chulabhorn Cancer Center, Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand;6. National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand;7. Bumrungrad Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand;8. Wattanosoth Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
Abstract:AimIn this study, an accuracy survey of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric arc radiation therapy (VMAT) implementation in radiotherapy centers in Thailand was conducted.BackgroundIt is well recognized that there is a need for radiotherapy centers to evaluate the accuracy levels of their current practices, and use the related information to identify opportunities for future development.Materials and methodsAn end-to-end test using a CIRS thorax phantom was carried out at 8 participating centers. Based on each center's protocol for simulation and planning, linac-based IMRT or VMAT plans were generated following the IAEA (CRP E24017) guidelines. Point doses in the region of PTVs and OARs were obtained from 5 ionization chamber readings and the dose distribution from the radiochromic films. The global gamma indices of the measurement doses and the treatment planning system calculation doses were compared.ResultsThe large majority of the RT centers (6/8) fulfilled the dosimetric goals, with the measured and calculated doses at the specification points agreeing within ±3% for PTV and ±5% for OARS. At 2 centers, TPS underestimated the lung doses by about 6% and spinal cord doses by 8%. The mean percentage gamma pass rates for the 8 centers were 98.29 ± 0.67% (for the 3%/3 mm criterion) and 96.72 ± 0.84% (for the 2%/2 mm criterion).ConclusionsThe 8 participating RT centers achieved a satisfactory quality level of IMRT/VMAT clinical implementation.
Keywords:IMRT  VMAT  Quality assurance  Accuracy  End-to-end test
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号