Natural killer cells in mice and man and their possible biological significance

Conclusions Despite active and extensive research on human and murine NK cells in the last few years a number of basic questions remain to be answered. These include the nature of the antigen(s) on target cells to which NK cells react, the nature of the receptors on NK cells allowing the recognition, the mechanism of NK cell cytotoxicity, the exact relationship between NK cell activities in vivo and in vitro, genetic control of NK cells, involvement of NK cells in the field of bone marrow transplantation, and finally their involvement in immunosurveillance of malignancies. Although the etiology and biologic significance of NK cells remain obscure, there is suggestive evidence that these cells may be in volved in resistance to and immunosurveillance of malignancies, since there is experimental evidence for a correlation between in vivo and in vitro NK cell activities. The fact that athymic mice do not have a higher incidence of malignancies than conventional mice and express delayed appearance and higher resistance to virally and chemically induced tumors (Stutman, 1975) is consistent with a protective role of the NK cell effector mechanism. In addition, their spontaneous occurrence without any necessity for priming and their ability to recognize and kill malignant cells makes NK cells almost perfect candidates for the part of immunosurveillors. The similarity between bone marrow effector cells and NK cells also seems unlikely to be fortuitous. In summary, this interesting cell requires further attention.