Wheat Cultivars Respond Differently to a Drying Top Soil and a Possible Non-Hydraulic Root Signal

Research has shown that when plant roots are exposed to a dryingsoil a non-hydraulic (chemical) signal is produced in the rootand transported to the shoot, causing stomatal closure and growthretardation. This study was designed to reveal genetic diversityin wheat response to soil conditions which elicit a root signal,as the first step in the investigation of the genetic controlof the production of and the response to the root signal. Five spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars were establishedin the growth chamber in soil-filled polyvinyl chloride tubes,120 cm long and of an internal diameter of 10·2 cm. Soilwas well fertilized and wet to field capacity at emergence whentwo treatments were imposed: (1) tubes were watered from thetop as needed to eliminate stress (control); and (2) tubes hada constant water table at a soil depth of 100 to 120 cm, withno applied water. Measurements were performed on five dateson leaf water status and stomatal diffusive resistance. Above-groundbiomass and grain yield per plant were determined at maturity. The water table treatment resulted in dry and hard top soilconditions which were previously indicated to elicit a possibleroot signal. Under these experimental conditions, cultivarsdiffered in their leaf water status, stomatal diffusive resistance(R_s) and plant production. In the control treatment, R_s of cultivarsincreased with reductions in their relative water content (RWC)and leaf water potential (LWP), indicating the expected controlof R_s by leaf water status. Under conditions of a drying topsoil, relative water content (RWC) and leaf water potential(LWP) increased in cultivars that had a higher R_s, indicatingthat stomatal activity was controlling leaf water status. Itwas therefore suggested that the drying top soil elicited aroot signal which caused stomatal closure and reduced plantproduction. Under such conditions, two cultivars (Bethlehemand V748) consistently maintained relatively low R_s and highplant production, despite their relatively lower RWC and LWP,as compared with cvs C97, V747 and V652. Limited observationssuggest that in these two cultivars relatively fewer roots mayhave been exposed to the drying top soil, as compared with theother three cultivars. Key words: Triticum aestivum, cultivars, soil moistrue, drought stress, root, root signal, stomata, relative water content, leaf water potential, biomass, yield