Studies in Stomatal Behaviour: V. THE ROLE OF CARBON DIOXIDE IN THE LIGHT RESPONSE OF STOMATA

It was found that stomata on illuminated leaves, both of Pelargoniumand wheat, opened much wider where the leaf surface was enclosedin a small volume of air, as in a normal porometer cup, thanelsewhere. This was shown for both species by the infiltrationmethod, and for Pelargonium by Lloyd's method and direct microscopicalobservation also. The effect was shown not to be due to pressure of the porometercup or glass plate on the leaf, or to temperature differences,nor directly to the lack of movement or high humidity of theenclosed air. A considerable body of data was collected which appeared tosupport the hypothesis that the wide opening was due to accumulationof some volatile substance produced by the leaf, but all theresults were also consistent with the view that it was causedby reduction in the carbon dioxide content of the enclosed airbelow the normal 0·03 per cent. owing to photosynthesis.Further crucial experiments with both the porometer and infiltrationmethods left virtually no doubt that the latter hypothesis wascorrect. This extreme sensitivity of stomata to carbon dioxide concentrationwithin the range 0·03 per cent. to zero is discussedin relation to their operation in nature, and a possible biologicaladvantage is suggested. The bearing of the effect upon porometer investigations is alsodiscussed and it is concluded that for all quantitative or semi-quantitativeexperimentation it is essential to use a cup detached betweenreadings, or at least swept with air such as surrounds the restof the leaf, and to have the upper leaf surface above the cuparea freely exposed or similarly swept. For qualitative investigationof the light response of stomata the traditional form of cupmay be used. The importance is stressed of allowing porometer readings toreach equilibrium under one set of conditions before changingto another, when investigating the ‘closing’ or‘opening’ effects of external factors. Several subsidiary effects, observed in the course of the investigation,are discussed; in particular an effect of humidity upon therate of response to other factors.