首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

不同质子泵抑制剂对冠脉支架植入术后氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林抗血小板作用的研究
作者姓名:Cai J  Wu Q  Fan L  Liu CF  Wang ZG  Sun J
作者单位:[1]解放军总医院国际医学中心,北京100853 [2]解放军总医院心内科,北京100853
基金项目:军队保健专项项日(07BJZ01)
摘    要:目的:通过比较奥美拉唑和泮托拉唑对冠状动脉支架术(PCI)后患者血小板功能指标和主要不良心血管事件与出血并发症发生情况,探讨不同质子泵抑制剂对PCI后氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林抗血小板作用的影响。方法:60例实施PCI后常规联合抗血小板治疗(氯吡格雷75mg/d+阿司匹林100mg/d)患者随机分为奥美拉唑组(40mg/d,20例),泮托拉唑组(40mg/d,20例)和对照组(20例),连续用药30d。分别在服药前1d及服药15d,30d用血栓弹力图检测ADP途径诱导的血小板抑制率值和比浊法检测ADP途径诱导的血小板最大聚集率(MPAR)。并观察30d各组主要不良心血管事件和出血并发症的发生情况。结果:①奥美拉唑组和泮托拉唑组与对照组相比,服药前1d及服药15d,30d用血栓弹力图检测的血小板抑制率和比浊法检测的血小板最大聚集率(MPAR)均无明显变化;奥美拉唑与泮托拉唑组间比较,差异也无统计学意义。服药15d,30d与服药前1d相比,每组血小板抑制率明显升高,血小板最大聚集率明显下降,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);但15d和30d相比较,差异无统计学意义。②三组比较心血管事件发生率相近,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);奥美拉唑组和泮托拉唑组比较,心血管事件发生率也无统计学差异(P0.05)。③与对照组比较,奥美拉唑组和泮托拉唑组胃肠道出血发生率均明显减少,有统计学意义(P0.05),但两服药组间比较,出血发生率无明显区别,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林具有增强血小板抑制,降低血小板凝聚的作用,而不同机制质子泵抑制剂奥美拉唑与泮托拉唑对PCI术后氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林抗血小板治疗患者的血小板功能无明显影响,不降低对心血管事件的预防效果,同时明显降低患者胃肠出血事件的发生率。

关 键 词:血小板功能  氯吡格雷  质子泵抑制剂  血小板聚集  心血管事件  经皮冠状动脉介入治疗

Impact of different proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel in combination with aspirin for patients undergoing coronary stent implantation
Cai J,Wu Q,Fan L,Liu CF,Wang ZG,Sun J.Impact of different proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel in combination with aspirin for patients undergoing coronary stent implantation[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Physiology,2010,26(3):266-269.
Authors:Cai Jun  Wu Qiang  Fan Li  Liu Chang-Fu  Wang Zhi-Guo  Sun Jing
Institution:International Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the impact of different proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel. Methods: A total of 60 hospitalized patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned to receive omeprazole group 40 mg/d(20 patients), pantoprazole group 40mg/d(20 patients ) and control group(20 patients ). All patients also received standard clopidogrel therapy, continuouing 30 days treatments. The percentage clotting inhibition was measured by the use of thrombelastogram and the maximal platelet aggregation rate(MPAR) was measured by turbidity method at the first day before admission and 15 or 30 days after treatment. Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events(MACCE) and hemorrhagic events within 30 days were recorded. Results: The baseline cliulcal characteristics , angiography and PCI result were compared among the three groups. At the first day before admission and 15 or 30 days after treatment, no significant difference was shown in the percentage clotting inhibition measured by thrombelastogram and the maximal platelet aggregation rate(MPAR) measured by turbidity method among the three groups. Though the platelet agglutination inhibition rate measured at 15 and 30 days increased and MPAR measured at 15 and 30 days declined compared with the baseline data ( P 〈 0.05), no significant difference was found between levels measured at 15 and 30 days( P 〉 0.05). The rates of MACCE had no significant difference among the three groups. Compared with control group, the rates of hemorrhagic event were significantly decreased in omeprazole or pantoprazole group (P 〈 0.05), but no significant difference was shown between the omeprazole and pantoprazole group. Conclusion: No significant impact of different proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet activity of elopidogrel has been found in patients undergoing commury stent implantation and short-time combined administration is safe .
Keywords:platelet function  clopidogrel  proton pump inhibitors  platelet aggregation  major adverse cardiac and cerebral events  angioplasty translaminal percutaneous coronary intervention
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号