Influence of Human Food Consumption on the Time Budget of Vervets

In nonhuman primate groups that utilize crop and food-raiding strategies, the inclusion of human food in the diet can have a pervasive impact on the activity budget. Human food is usually of higher quality and energy per unit than wild food. Thus, metabolic demands may be reached sooner on a human food diet, which in turn leads to improved foraging efficiency. In particular, a reduction in time spent feeding is associated with an increase in time spent resting. We investigated changes in time budget in a group of vervets (Chlorocebus aethiops pygerthrus) living in a tourist and cultivated area of Entebbe, Uganda (Zoo group). Saj collected 123 hr of focal observations on 17 individuals. Human food constituted half of the diet of Zoo group. Access to human food resulted in a high proportion of time resting and a low proportion of time feeding. The group had a small average daily range and a small home range in relation to other reports on unprovisioned groups. The time budget differences suggest that the juveniles spent more time moving and feeding and less time resting than adults did, and that adult females were more social than adult males were. These patterns have been observed in both provisioned and unprovisioned vervet groups. In contrast to a report from an unprovisioned group (Harrison, 1983), lactating females in this provisioned situation were able to maintain feeding and activity levels similar to those of other adults. However, adult females spent significantly less time consuming human food than juveniles did. We suggest that the risk associated with human food consumption may explain the low consumption of human food by females with dependent offspring. The differences may also reflect the different nutritional requirements of lactating females or the tendency for juveniles to be more exploratory than other group members.