Kinetic Analysis of Drug-Induced G2 Block In Vitro

The data on cell-cycle effects of two prospective antitumour agents, (+)-1,2,-bis(3,5-dioxopiperazine-l-yl)propane (soluble ICRF; NSC 169780) and 1,4-bis(2′chloroethyl)-1,4-diazabicyclo 2.2.1] heptane diperchlorate (CBH; NSC 57198) were used to determine whether a modified stathmokinetic experiment could predict the effects of continuous, long-term (0–48 hr) drug exposure in an in vitro L1210 murine leukaemia cell system. Generally, continuous drug exposure of exponentially growing cells does not provide sufficient quantitative information concerning cell-cycle-phase-specific mechanisms of drug action. Alternatively, stathmokinetic experiments, which are usually limited to some fraction of one cell doubling time, provide little information about long-term drug effects. By using mathematical models constructed for this purpose, however, stathmokinetic data can predict the overall proportion of cells affected by a drug though failing to discern between various kinds of drug action (e.g. reversible v. irreversible block, blocking v. killing action, etc.), especially when it occurs in G₂ phase. In addition, it can be shown that for at least one of the drugs (soluble ICRF) the stathmokinetic experiment fails to predict ‘after-effects’ of drug treatment which extend into the following cell cycle(s). It also becomes clear that the degradation of exponential growth characteristics of quickly dividing cells during long-term, continuous drug exposure makes prediction of cell-cycle kinetic perturbations uncertain when derived from short-duration stathmokinetic experiments. However, with care, the joint application of ‘short term’ (e.g. stathmokinesis) and ‘long term’ (e.g. continuous exposure) techniques allow adequate quantitative insight into drug-perturbed cell-cycle kinetics. the applicability of modelling techniques is discussed: in the present instance it is limited to lower drug concentrations. For higher drug concentrations, effects like increased ploidy, ineffective division, etc., make it impossible in the present study to obtain a clear picture of the kinetics.