The use of direct epifluorescent microscopy (DEM) and the direct epifluorescent filter technique (DEFT) to assess microbial populations on food contact surfaces

Two rapid methods, direct epifluorescent microscopy (DEM) and the direct epifluorescent filter technique (DEFT) on swab resuspension fluids, were compared with the traditional total viable count (TVC) on swab resuspension fluids for their ability to enumerate surface populations of attached bacteria. The degree of error in estimating surface populations was shown to be significantly less with DEM than DEFT followed by TVC. DEM estimated populations in the range 3 times 10³ to 5 times 10⁷ colonies/cm² whilst DEFT enumerated populations above 3 times 10⁴ colonies/cm² and TVC above 3 times 10⁵ colonies/cm² (as measured by DEM). Swabbing was shown to remove a constant proportion of organisms from the surface populations tested, although below 3 times 10⁵ colonies/cm² most of the organisms remained in the cotton matrix and were difficult to resuspend. DEFT was more able to enumerate swab resuspension fluids obtained from surface populations below 3 times 10⁵ colonies/cm² than was TVC.